AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Cooperative multi-agent RL

Offline and networked MARL

Learns multi-agent policies from fixed datasets or with networked, scalable value decomposition.

65 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Cooperative multi-agent RL, keyword cluster “decentralized · value · joint”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 30 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 11.3% to 13.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 1182019: 1192020: 2202021: 5212022: 9222023: 9232024: 7242025: 17252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

46 papers here report 399 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 62%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 23%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use 1 Shapley-value approximation sample instead of more samplesPredator-prey (3 agents) · average rewardHurtSTAS: Spatial-Temporal Return Decomposition for Solving Sparse Rewards Problems in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
use inter-agent attention rather than independent U-NetsMPE tasks, especially World · average normalized scoreHelpedMADiff: Offline Multi-agent Learning with Diffusion Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations)
add policy entropyM-NE game, imbalanced · convergence to global optimumHelpedOffline Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via In-Sample Sequential Policy Optimization (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
increase κ from 1 to at least 3Safe ManyAgent Ant (6×1), Safe Ant (8×1), and Safe Coupled HalfCheetah (12×1) · average episode rewardHelpedScalable Constrained Policy Optimization for Safe Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
use adaptive rather than uniform groupingGather · total reward11.6%HelpedGTDE: Grouped Training with Decentralized Execution for Multi-agent Actor-Critic (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Replace the learned mask with random maskingMonaco and NewYork51 · performanceHurtBayesian Ego-graph inference for Networked Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Use simultaneous rather than sequential agent updatesTraining schemes · performanceNo clear effectBackpropagation Through Agents (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
Use RBF kernel parametrization instead of discretizationAggregation d=4 · training performanceHelpedLearning Decentralized Partially Observable Mean Field Control for Artificial Collective Behavior (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
increase the subsampling parameter kConstrained Exploration (n=8) · discounted cumulative rewardHelpedMean-Field Sampling for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
remove the hierarchy and use a flat MAPPO policyMetaDrive environments · success rate0.99 (±0.01) -> 0HurtHMARL-CBF – Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Control Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Autonomous Systems (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
use stochastic rather than deterministic rollouts to learn the DGCBFunspecified comparison · costHurtDiscrete GCBF Proximal Policy Optimization for Multi-agent Safe Optimal Control (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Set regularization parameter α around 10 rather than other tested valuesSMACv2 and MaMuJoCo · win rate and returnsHelpedComaDICE: Offline Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Stationary Distribution Shift Regularization (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 19 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • SMACv1 offline datasets (MAPPO-generated) · 2 of 19 papers

Baselines

  • BC · 4 of 19 papers
  • BCQ · 2 of 19 papers
  • CQL · 2 of 19 papers
  • AlberDICE · 2 of 19 papers
  • IPPO · 2 of 19 papers
  • OMAR · 2 of 19 papers
  • OMIGA · 2 of 19 papers
  • InforMARL · 2 of 19 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 46 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy