AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Vision-based robot RL

Learn transferable visual control policies and world models for embodied agents.

44 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Visual and representation RL, keyword cluster “robot · manipulation · simulation”

State History Tried Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

10 papers in 2023–24 and 14 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 1.7% to 2.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 1182019: 5192020: 5202021: 3212022: 6222023: 4232024: 6242025: 6252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

33 papers here report 314 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 22%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
remove the reference pathF317 and GT3 · lap completion97.67 -> Fail (F317); 109.51 -> Fail (GT3)HurtA Simulation Benchmark for Autonomous Racing with Large-Scale Human Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations)
Add height information to the 2D trajectoryUnseen tasks (overall) · success rate50% -> 67%HelpedRT-Trajectory: Robotic Task Generalization via Hindsight Trajectory Sketches (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
Use stage termination checks instead of a 25-step timeoutRS-Can · success rate69% -> 100%HelpedPlan-Seq-Learn: Language Model Guided RL for Solving Long Horizon Robotics Tasks (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add the rigid-body dynamics inductive bias to the predictorHopper-hop · prediction performanceHelpedNeural Motion Simulator Pushing the Limit of World Models in Reinforcement Learning (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
use dense rewards instead of sparse rewardsCALVIN D · Avg. Length1.74 -> 1.90HelpedReinboT: Amplifying Robot Visual-Language Manipulation with Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
add ELO ranking instead of greedy replacement of the top-rated goalDrawer Open · final success rate0.20 ± 0.35 -> 0.97 ± 0.11HelpedGoalLadder: Incremental Goal Discovery with Vision-Language Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add a scaffolded exploration policy that collects data alongside the target policyBlind Pick · task performanceHelpedPrivileged Sensing Scaffolds Reinforcement Learning (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Use sparse reward instead of the shaped rewardAllegroHand · Reward38777 -> 0HurtPosition: Automatic Environment Shaping is the Next Frontier in RL (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
combine observation and action warnings with AND rather than ORAll environments · TWA0.51^{± 0.01} -> 0.65^{± 0.01}HelpedFailure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policies (NeurIPS 2025)

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 24 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy