AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Scalable RL systems and environments

Scale RL training and benchmark environments.

179 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Visual and representation RL, keyword cluster “search · decision · systems”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

49 papers in 2023–24 and 47 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.6% to 6.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 5172018: 11182019: 11192020: 18202021: 15212022: 22222023: 20232024: 29242025: 21252026: 2626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

144 papers here report 1,357 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 20%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use cross-entropy rather than regression for value-function trainingAitW device-control tasks · performancearound 12%HelpedDigiRL: Training In-The-Wild Device-Control Agents with Autonomous Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations)
use dynamic DRL-based actor scheduling instead of 32 actors every roundHopper-v3 · training cost1.7 ± 0.3 vs 1.2 ± 0.2HelpedCheaper and Faster: Distributed Deep Reinforcement Learning with Serverless Computing (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
Add attention during GNN aggregationCentipede-{4,6} → Centipede-16 · episode rewardsHelpedA Transfer Approach Using Graph Neural Networks in Deep Reinforcement Learning (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Add the Bias Factor Loss (BFL) to BiCoGANCP-Noisy: HD, source and target domains · model bias84% (on the source domain), 43% (on the target domain 1), and 56% (on the target domain 2)HelpedACAMDA: Improving Data Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning through Guided Counterfactual Data Augmentation (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
add advantage per-minibatch zero-mean normalizationFive Brax MuJoCo environments · per-environment tuned normalized scoreHelpedA Method for Evaluating Hyperparameter Sensitivity in Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
select the best checkpoint using generalization-environment performanceSame Game 5x5c3s2 generalization · success rate9.4\% -> 18.1\%HelpedPUZZLES: A Benchmark for Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Add object-detection noise (5% misdetection probability and Gaussian noise with 3-pixel standard deviation)Atari games, especially Kangaroo · human-normalized scoreMixedInterpretable Concept Bottlenecks to Align Reinforcement Learning Agents (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
remove transformer embeddingsAll APIs · Coverage95.6% -> 87.2%HurtAPIRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning for REST API Fuzzing (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
Use Robust PLR rather than vanilla PLRCraftax-1B · evaluation rewardHurtCraftax: A Lightning-Fast Benchmark for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2024 · 4 citations)
Increase the classical DNN width from 16 to 64BeamManagement6G · sample complexityHelpedBenchmarking Quantum Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 3 citations)
Use CoT prompting instead of non-CoT promptingminiF2F-test · pass rate57.4\% -> 60.2\%HelpedDeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search (ICLR 2025 · 3 citations)
Train with four generators instead of only the uniform generatorVLSI TSP test set (1,020 instances) · mean tour length6.090 ;(± 0.029) -> 5.815 ;(± 0.025)HelpedJumanji: a Diverse Suite of Scalable Reinforcement Learning Environments in JAX (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 27 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MuJoCo · 3 of 27 papers
  • Meta-World · 2 of 27 papers
  • MineDojo tasks · 2 of 27 papers

Baselines

  • DreamerV3 · 3 of 27 papers
  • SAC · 3 of 27 papers
  • PPO · 2 of 27 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 96 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy