AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Latent-space world models

Learn latent dynamics models and temporal-consistency objectives for model-based and transfer RL.

83 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Visual and representation RL, keyword cluster “representation · latent · generalization”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

32 papers in 2023–24 and 19 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 5.6% to 2.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 3182019: 3192020: 10202021: 8212022: 6222023: 17232024: 15242025: 10252026: 926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

70 papers here report 730 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 60%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 22%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use longer-horizon prediction (larger γ) rather than one-step predictionGoal transfer in gridworld · episode scoreHelpedPredictive auxiliary objectives in deep RL mimic learning in the brain (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
Enforce expert diversity with Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization instead of using a mixture of experts without orthogonalizationMetaWorld MT10-rand and MT50-rand · success rate and sample efficiencyHelpedMulti-Task Reinforcement Learning with Mixture of Orthogonal Experts (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase the synthetic-to-real data ratioDMC hopper-stand and humanoid-stand · episodic returnHurtStealing That Free Lunch: Exposing the Limits of Dyna-Style Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
integrate dynamic modulation into the RSSM sequence modelBoxing, Krull, Pong, and Road Runner · performanceHelpedDyMoDreamer: World Modeling with Dynamic Modulation (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Add counterfactual data augmentationAnt · average return6231±81 -> 6418±81HelpedCausal Information Prioritization for Efficient Reinforcement Learning (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Decrease the augmented replay ratio by generating more augmented transitions per observed transitionPanda tasks · data efficiencyHelpedUnderstanding when Dynamics-Invariant Data Augmentations Benefit Model-free Reinforcement Learning Updates (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Remove the representation-mismatch reward penalty (set β=0)halfcheetah (broken back thigh) and walker (no right thigh) · final returnHurtCross-Domain Policy Adaptation by Capturing Representation Mismatch (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Increase the reward loss coefficientMeta-world tasks · sample efficiencyHelpedHarmonyDream: Task Harmonization Inside World Models (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use limb-based state representation without augmentation (rho_aug=0%)6 tasks shown in the first 2 rows · data efficiencyHelpedReinforcement Learning with Euclidean Data Augmentation for State-Based Continuous Control (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add segmentation-based gradient aggregationCheetah Run, unaltered and Reafferent Control · score742.1 ± 79.7 -> 712.3 ± 32.3; 188.4 ± 9.4 -> 383.1 ± 23.8MixedPolicy-shaped prediction: avoiding distractions in model-based reinforcement learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Remove the optimism term from the self-predictive objectiveCombination lock MDP · self-predictive lossNo clear effectReinforcement Learning Under Latent Dynamics: Toward Statistical and Algorithmic Modularity (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
remove action prediction model KL regularization (MTC-NoA)Cheetah Run; action noise and mass changes · robustnessHurtMaximum Total Correlation Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 12 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Meta-World · 3 of 12 papers
  • DeepMind Control Suite · 2 of 12 papers
  • Atari 100k · 2 of 12 papers

Baselines

  • SAC · 5 of 12 papers
  • DreamerV3 · 5 of 12 papers
  • TD-MPC2 · 4 of 12 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 51 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy