atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Cross-Domain Policy Adaptation by Capturing Representation Mismatch

ICML 2024 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Latent-space world models · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes PAR, which learns state and state-action encoders only on target-domain transitions and uses the resulting representation deviation on source transitions as a reward penalty for SAC-based cross-domain policy adaptation.

Problem

Policy adaptation under dynamics mismatch between a source domain with abundant data (online or offline) and a target domain with only limited online interactions, where state, action and reward spaces are shared.

Approach

Learn deterministic state and state-action encoders only from target-domain data with a latent dynamics consistency loss, then penalize source-domain rewards by the representation deviation of source transitions; theory links this deviation to the return gap between domains.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use PAR instead of SAC-tarOnline policy adaptation · 8 kinematic and morphology-shift taskstarget-domain returnHelped
Use PAR instead of the strongest baselineOnline policy adaptation · 8 kinematic and morphology-shift taskstarget-domain return: 6 out of 8 tasksMixed
Use PAR instead of SAC-tuneOnline policy adaptation · 8 kinematic and morphology-shift taskstarget-domain return: 7 out of 8 tasksHelped
Use PAR with offline source data instead of baseline methodsOffline policy adaptation · 24 taskstarget-domain return: 17 out of 24 tasksHelped
Remove the representation-mismatch reward penalty (set β=0) (ablation)PAR · halfcheetah (broken back thigh) and walker (no right thigh)final returnHurt
Use a large reward penalty coefficient β (ablation)PAR · some tasks, including walkerreturnHurt
Replace the representation-learning objective with the PAR-B objective (ablation)PAR · four kinematic and morphology-mismatch taskstarget-domain returnNo clear effect
Increase target-domain interaction interval F (ablation)PAR · online policy adaptationreturnHelped
Increase source dataset quality to medium-expert (ablation)PAR · many offline taskstarget-domain returnHelped
Use medium-replay source datasetsPAR · some offline taskstarget-domain returnHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: OpenAI Gym halfcheetah hopper walker ant D4RL -v2 datasets

Benchmarks: OpenAI Gym halfcheetah, hopper, walker, ant with kinematic and morphology shifts D4RL-based offline source tasks (24 tasks)

Metrics: average return in target domain standard deviation over seeds

Baselines: SAC-tar DARC DARC-weight VGDF SAC-tune CQL-0 CQL+SAC H2O VGDF+BC

Builds on: SAC DARC VGDF CQL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy