AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Statistical analysis of ML practice

Applies survival analysis, additive models and variable selection to understand reproducibility and importance.

122 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Molecules and proteins, keyword cluster “decision · machine · statistical”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

38 papers in 2023–24 and 39 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.8% to 4.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 6162017: 6172018: 3182019: 5192020: 5202021: 14212022: 6222023: 21232024: 17242025: 23252026: 1626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

93 papers here report 868 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 18%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use a better experiment schedule rather than CVGP's default scheduleTrigonometric (4,4,6), 10 expressions · NMSEHelpedRacing Control Variable Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Replace gradient ascent with DENsJurkat, K562, and THP1 · cell-type-specificity (DE)HurtDesigning Cell-Type-Specific Promoter Sequences Using Conservative Model-Based Optimization (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
halve feedforward layer size from 2048 to 1024ProGenomes v3 test set · accuracy71.2 -> 66.2HurtWhole Genome Transformer for Gene Interaction Effects in Microbiome Habitat Specificity (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Add QP-NetPre-School · MAE8.129 -> 7.949HelpedQ-PART: Quasi-Periodic Adaptive Regression with Test-time Training for Pediatric Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Regression (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Add MMFDisease progression identification · F10.460 -> 0.466HelpedMultimodal Disease Progression Modeling via Spatiotemporal Disentanglement and Multiscale Alignment (NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations)
Replace the Utah chilling function with a learned MLP chilling functionJapan — temporal · MAE (days)3.17 \textpm 0.07 -> 2.17 \textpm 0.03HelpedHybrid Phenology Modeling for Predicting Temperature Effects on Tree Dormancy (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Use service and feature representations instead of omitting representationsCARES of NY service assignment test set · accuracy0.717 -> 0.832HelpedPredictive Modeling of Homeless Service Assignment: A Representation Learning Approach (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Vary clustGeo parameters α and λ across parameterizations31 bird species · AUCMixedSpatial Clustering of Citizen Science Data Improves Downstream Species Distribution Models (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Add range text rather than providing no metadataIUCN, zero-shot · MAP0.05 -> 0.52HelpedFeedforward Few-shot Species Range Estimation (ICML 2025 · 2 citations)
Add a prevalence constraint using known disease prevalenceSynthetic data, Bernoulli-sigmoid models · parameter inference precision and accuracyHelpedDomain constraints improve risk prediction when outcome data is missing (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Tokenize numerical metrics using uniform quantizationAvg. Test (Base) · MSE96.99 -> 37.72HelpedARECHO: Autoregressive Evaluation via Chain-Based Hypothesis Optimization for Speech Multi-Metric Estimation (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Replace one foundation model with an ensemble of 5 to 7 modelsStudy by [cite], 50 samples · varianceapproximately 6% to nearly 12%; around 16%HelpedEfficient Randomized Experiments Using Foundation Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 28 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • LSTM · 2 of 28 papers
  • Transformer · 2 of 28 papers
  • Difference-in-means · 2 of 28 papers
  • PPI++ · 2 of 28 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 77 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy