AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Prediction-powered and conformal inference

Gives valid statistical inference using conformal, prediction-powered and multiple-testing methods.

129 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Molecules and proteins, keyword cluster “decision · machine · statistical”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

25 papers in 2023–24 and 69 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 5.1% to 7.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 4172018: 3182019: 3192020: 6202021: 7212022: 9222023: 11232024: 14242025: 31252026: 3826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

82 papers here report 727 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 18%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
remove CPA* adversarial componentSrivatsan transfer · Cosine LogFC rank0.15 ± 1 × 10^{-2} -> 0.09 ± 4 × 10^{-3}HelpedPerturBench: Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Cellular Perturbation Analysis (NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations)
Add inferred gene regulatory networks from ATAC and RNA dataUnseen-context perturbation prediction · prediction performanceHurtA benchmark for prediction of transcriptomic responses to chemical perturbations across cell types (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Add instance-specific weights to exponential age weightingGeo · accuracyHelpedInstance-Conditional Timescales of Decay for Non-Stationary Learning (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
add the counterfactual KL auxiliary lossNorman, 3σ · ATE-ρ0.6505 ± 0.02 -> 0.7119 ± 0.03HelpedCradle-VAE: Enhancing Single-Cell Gene Perturbation Modeling with Counterfactual Reasoning-based Artifact Disentanglement (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Vary the Wendland kernel range from 1,000 km to 500 km or 2,500 kmCMIP6 surface temperature and precipitation · model rankingNo clear effectValidating Climate Models with Spherical Convolutional Wasserstein Distance (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase max batch size from 4 to 64GPQA on NVIDIA H100 · energy per generation9713.7 -> 2770.8HelpedThe ML.ENERGY Benchmark: Toward Automated Inference Energy Measurement and Optimization (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
use SPI-Subset instead of SPI-WholeImageNet, label-conditional · prediction set sizeHelpedSynthetic-powered predictive inference (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Use level-$(1-6\alpha/(n^2\pi^2))$ confidence sequences in round nNon-partitioned SCD, no change · probability of false alarms\mathbb{P} (\infty)(\tau<\infty) \leq \alphaHelpedReducing sequential change detection to sequential estimation (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Fine-tune the predictive model during label collectionPew 2020 election survey — Biden and Trump approval · budget required for matched confidence interval widthBiden: around 40\% vs. no fine-tuning and 30\% vs. PPI; Trump: around 45\% and 35\%HelpedActive Statistical Inference (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Reduce the censoring-model training sample size, lowering imputation qualitySynthetic setting 1 · coverageHurtDoubly Robust Conformalized Survival Analysis with Right-Censored Data (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add adaptive shrinkage to PTSynthetic, f1(x)=x² · MSE (× 10^-3)2.642 ± 0.027 -> 0.272 ± 0.003HelpedPrediction-Powered Adaptive Shrinkage Estimation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the Q-DCP smoothness parameter κ from small to large valuesCIFAR100 torus graph · set sizeMixedDistributed Conformal Prediction via Message Passing (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 37 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 3 of 37 papers
  • galaxies · 2 of 37 papers
  • forest · 2 of 37 papers
  • healthcare · 2 of 37 papers
  • census · 2 of 37 papers
  • genes · 2 of 37 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 37 papers

Baselines

  • PPI · 5 of 37 papers
  • SAMS-VAE · 2 of 37 papers
  • GEARS · 2 of 37 papers
  • RePPI · 2 of 37 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 94 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy