AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Sparse concepts and hypothesis testing

Defines and tests emergent sparse interactions and statistical significance in networks.

78 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Molecules and proteins, keyword cluster “decision · machine · statistical”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

27 papers in 2023–24 and 25 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 5.5% to 2.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 2172018: 2182019: 5192020: 7202021: 7212022: 3222023: 12232024: 15242025: 17252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

63 papers here report 582 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 18%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Replace MSE loss with maximum-likelihood N-lossMultiple datasets · MAEHelpedFrom GARCH to Neural Network for Volatility Forecast (AAAI 2024 · 13 citations)
combine diffusion and advection processesBeijing and Shenzhen, 24h–72h · MAEHelpedAirPhyNet: Harnessing Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Air Quality Prediction (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
Use minimum leaf size 20Proof of concept · type I error rate and power5%; 100%HelpedConditional Feature Importance with Generative Modeling Using Adversarial Random Forests (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Add both 1-D and 2-D temporal predicatesSentiment analysis · explanation fidelityHelpedReX: A Framework for Incorporating Temporal Information in Model-Agnostic Local Explanation Techniques (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
vary the number of unknown parameters to 2 instead of 4Forced Damped Pendulum · MCC0.99(0.00) -> 0.97(0.01)No clear effectOn the Identifiability of Hybrid Deep Generative Models: Meta-Learning as a Solution (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
add the non-shared deep architecture variant (b)Air quality (NO2) · correlation0.880 (0.052) -> 0.897 (0.047)No clear effectA Functional Extension of Semi-Structured Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use an implicit time-varying loss instead of an explicit lossSynthetic time-varying potential · potential recoveryHelpedLearning diffusion at lightspeed (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Replace random sampling after Gradient-based Filtering with Multigrid Genetic SamplingFour biological systems · RMSEHelpedHierarchical Gradient-Based Genetic Sampling for Accurate Prediction of Biological Oscillations (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
use Top probability ordering instead of vanilla decodingSudoku · accuracy6.88% -> 18.51%HelpedTrain for the Worst, Plan for the Best: Understanding Token Ordering in Masked Diffusions (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase GradSHAP(t) integration samplesSimulated survival data · local accuracyHelpedGradient-based Explanations for Deep Learning Survival Models (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
replace Gaussian RBF with soft distillationmESC · AUPRC0.646 -> 0.636HurtKINDLE: Knowledge-Guided Distillation for Prior-Free Gene Regulatory Network Inference (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add bidirectional attentionSynthetic Case 1, N=200 · MSE0.0812 -> 0.0783HelpedFAME: Adaptive Functional Attention with Expert Routing for Function-on-Function Regression (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • KernelSHAP · 3 of 17 papers
  • LIME · 2 of 17 papers
  • Random · 2 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 52 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy