AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Machine learning for physical simulation

Builds datasets, benchmarks and graph models for fluid and multiphysics simulation and design.

96 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Molecules and proteins, keyword cluster “decision · machine · statistical”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

32 papers in 2023–24 and 45 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 6.5% to 4.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 2182019: 0192020: 2202021: 7212022: 7222023: 17232024: 15242025: 30252026: 1526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

70 papers here report 707 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 21%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add pre-trainingWater temperature, summer · RMSE3.578 (0.938) -> 1.953 (0.126)HelpedPhysics-Guided Foundation Model for Scientific Discovery: An Application to Aquatic Science (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Increase the objective-loss weight w1Validation set · average weightHelpedDeep Generative Model for Mechanical System Configuration Design (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Use a directional autoencoder instead of a traditional autoencoderNanophotonics · correlation of latent variables with physical quantitiesHelpedAutoSciLab: A Self-Driving Laboratory for Interpretable Scientific Discovery (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
Use frequency queries instead of predicting all frequencies on a fixed gridV-5000 · MSE0.19 -> 0.08HelpedLearning to Predict Structural Vibrations (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
warm up with PtO MSE training, then fine-tune with Blackbox PnO7 benchmark datasets · regretMixedBenchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Use y(r) features instead of x(r)W4-17 · RMSE2.35 -> 1.95HelpedLearning Generalized Residual Exchange-Correlation-Uncertain Functional for Density Functional Theory (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
increase the number of training samples5G-Urban · nMSEHelpedPhysics-Informed Generative Modeling of Wireless Channels (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Use selection-only uncertainty adaptationSpace Invaders, offline · average rewardHelpedMonte Carlo Tree Search in the Presence of Transition Uncertainty (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
Add GTO and HFM to PW-only predictionBenzene · NMAE (%)6.92 -> 2.45HelpedGaussian Plane-Wave Neural Operator for Electron Density Estimation (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Add neural Fourier layers instead of standard CNN layersERA5 data assimilation, 1.40625° observations · MSE0.0230 -> 0.0202HelpedFNP: Fourier Neural Processes for Arbitrary-Resolution Data Assimilation (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add stochastic depth to the interpolatorInterpolated timesteps 1 to 5 · spread-skill ratioaround 0.26 to 0.35HelpedProbablistic Emulation of a Global Climate Model with Spherical DYffusion (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Remove the overlap matrix inputHamiltonian prediction (ablation; figure) · Hamiltonian MAEHurtInfusing Self-Consistency into Density Functional Theory Hamiltonian Prediction via Deep Equilibrium Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 34 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • Diffusion Forcing · 3 of 34 papers
  • MeshGraphNet · 2 of 34 papers
  • FNO · 2 of 34 papers
  • GNOT · 2 of 34 papers
  • Diffuser · 2 of 34 papers
  • GINO · 2 of 34 papers
  • Transolver · 2 of 34 papers
  • Diffuser-Replan · 2 of 34 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 77 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy