AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Generative protein structure design

Generates protein structures and sequences using flow matching, equivariant models and AlphaFold.

142 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Molecules and proteins, keyword cluster “proteins · binding · sequence”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

24 papers in 2023–24 and 109 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.9% to 11.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 1182019: 1192020: 0202021: 3212022: 3222023: 9232024: 15242025: 40252026: 6926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

62 papers here report 664 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 72%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 18%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
distill the generative process into a single forward passATLAS test ensembles · Root mean W2-distance2.61 -> 3.70HurtAlphaFold Meets Flow Matching for Generating Protein Ensembles (ICML 2024 · 88 citations)
Use Riemannian OT paths instead of independent couplingProtein backbone design · Designability fraction0.657 ± 0.042 -> 0.820 ± 0.037HelpedSE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation (ICLR 2024 · 15 citations)
add distillationCo-design 1 · designability0.42 -> 0.86HelpedGenerative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design (ICML 2024 · 12 citations)
use atom14 instead of hybrid14 representationprotein generation · DES-aa5% -> 87%HelpedP(all-atom) Is Unlocking New Path For Protein Design (ICML 2025 · 11 citations)
Use coil cutoff r_c = 0.75 instead of r_c = 0.5 during trainingFast-folding proteins · JS-TIC0.397 -> 0.373HelpedStr2Str: A Score-based Framework for Zero-shot Protein Conformation Sampling (ICLR 2024 · 10 citations)
Add ViennaRNA structure contextArchive2 · F174.38 -> 74.72HelpedBridging Sequence-Structure Alignment in RNA Foundation Models (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)
remove structure MSE lossSequence Similarity Split · RMSD+1.25 RMSD when removedHelpedRNAFlow: RNA Structure & Sequence Design via Inverse Folding-Based Flow Matching (ICML 2024 · 7 citations)
add the sidechain packing objectiveCATH 4.2 test set · sequence accuracyHelpedSidechain conditioning and modeling for full-atom protein sequence design with FAMPNN (ICML 2025 · 6 citations)
Use non-i.i.d. rather than i.i.d. ensemble samplingUbiquitin · correlation with experimental N-H S²r=0.52 -> r=0.72HelpedInverse problems with experiment-guided AlphaFold (ICML 2025 · 5 citations)
add global guidance to local-only guidanceSTP10 (inward) · all-atom RMSD3.860 -> 1.057HelpedMultiscale guidance of protein structure prediction with heterogeneous cryo-EM data (NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations)
add a skip connection from the structure encoder to the decoderProtein structure generation · PerformanceHelpedSequence-Augmented SE(3)-Flow Matching For Conditional Protein Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Add global landscape modelingCATH 4.2 · recovery rate (%)15.51 -> 57.78HelpedSurfPro: Functional Protein Design Based on Continuous Surface (ICML 2024 · 4 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 66 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • PDB · 11 of 66 papers
  • ATLAS · 6 of 66 papers
  • SAbDab · 5 of 66 papers
  • EMDB · 3 of 66 papers
  • AFDB · 3 of 66 papers
  • RAbD · 3 of 66 papers
  • CATH 4.2 · 3 of 66 papers
  • mdCATH · 3 of 66 papers

Baselines

  • ProteinMPNN · 10 of 66 papers
  • ESM3 · 6 of 66 papers
  • RFdiffusion · 5 of 66 papers
  • PiFold · 5 of 66 papers
  • MDGen · 5 of 66 papers
  • DiffAb · 4 of 66 papers
  • Chroma · 4 of 66 papers
  • BioEmu · 4 of 66 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 133 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 31 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy