atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Spatial Clustering of Citizen Science Data Improves Downstream Species Distribution Models

AAAI 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Statistical analysis of ML practice · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Compares ten site-construction approaches for post hoc occupancy modeling of citizen science eBird data, finding spatial clustering (clustGeo, DBSC) that uses both geographic and environmental similarity and keeps all points yields better AUC for 31 Oregon bird species.

Problem

Citizen science checklists lack the repeated-visit protocol required by occupancy models, so sites must be constructed post hoc from opportunistic observations; existing site construction methods discard data or ignore environmental similarity.

Approach

Applies machine learning spatial clustering (clustGeo with Bayesian-optimized parameters, and DBSC) to group eBird checklists into occupancy sites using both geographic and environmental feature distances, keeping all observations, and benchmarks these against ten site-construction approaches.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use spatial clustering algorithms that incorporate environmental and geographic similarity instead of geographic-only site constructionOccupancy models for eBird bird species · Southwest Oregon eBird test observationsAUCHelped
Retain all available observations rather than discard records when constructing sitesOccupancy models for eBird bird species · Southwest Oregon eBird test observationsAUCHelped
Use 2to10 or 2to10-sameObs site construction, which discards observations, instead of lat-longOccupancy models for eBird bird species · Southwest Oregon eBird test observationsAUCHurt
Select clustGeo parameters using test performance (best-clustGeo) rather than Bayesian optimizationclustGeo occupancy models · Southwest Oregon eBird test observationsAUCHelped
Vary clustGeo parameters α and λ across parameterizations (ablation)clustGeo occupancy models · 31 bird speciesAUCMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: eBird basic dataset (Oregon, 2017-2018) Landsat Tasseled Cap features DEM elevation

Benchmarks: eBird basic dataset held-out 2018 checklists

Metrics: AUC AUPRC percentage AUC improvement over lat-long

Baselines: SVS 1/UL lat-long 2to10 2to10-sameObs rounded-4 1-kmSq best-clustGeo

Builds on: clustGeo density-based spatial clustering (DBSC) occupancy models Bayesian optimization unmarked

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy