AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Sparse dictionary representations

Extracts interpretable features with sparse autoencoders and dictionary views of implicit neural representations.

98 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “layer · activation · functions”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 63 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.2% to 6.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 3182019: 0192020: 1202021: 3212022: 5222023: 4232024: 17242025: 22252026: 4126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

55 papers here report 566 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 55%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 30%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use random bases instead of fixed Fourier basesKodak 24 (first 3 images), average · PSNR24.71 -> 23.83HurtImproved Implicit Neural Representation with Fourier Reparameterized Training (CVPR 2024 · 28 citations)
add day-cycle gating and encodingMETR-LA, Average · MAE2.78 -> 2.71HelpedModWaveMLP: MLP-Based Mode Decomposition and Wavelet Denoising Model to Defeat Complex Structures in Traffic Forecasting (AAAI 2024 · 24 citations)
Add tied encoder-decoder initializationGPT-2 small, 128k latents, k=32 · MSEHelpedScaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders (ICLR 2025 · 11 citations)
Add spectral-sampling initialization with low and high frequency regions; increase high-frequency share from 30% to 70% at l=21Kodak images · Signal PSNR (dB)35.2 -> 35.0HurtTuning the Frequencies: Robust Training for Sinusoidal Neural Networks (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
Place SVA after layer2 rather than elsewhereRML2016.10a · OA (%)ResNet18: 58.84 -> 61.49; ResNet34: 59.40 -> 61.71; ResNet50: 59.26 -> 60.41HelpedHarnessing the Power of SVD: An SVA Module for Enhanced Signal Classification (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Freeze decoder directions at initializationIOI · sparse controllabilityHurtTowards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control (ICLR 2025 · 3 citations)
randomly re-initialize pruned weights instead of leaving them unperturbedCIFAR-100, ε=10% · test accuracyHurtDSD²: Can We Dodge Sparse Double Descent and Compress the Neural Network Worry-Free? (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase kernel size to ℓ=16 or 32AWGN · BERHelpedDeepPolar: Inventing Nonlinear Large-Kernel Polar Codes via Deep Learning (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Replace the ℓ2 reconstruction loss with an ℓ1 lossSAE training and concept interpretability · training dynamics and interpretabilityHelpedUniversal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Vary perturbation size relative to the HiPPO matrixsCIFAR · test accuracyMixedRobustifying State-space Models for Long Sequences via Approximate Diagonalization (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Use a deep fully-connected decoder in place of the RI-GAMP-inspired decoderSparse Gaussian compression · MSENo clear effectCompression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and Depth (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
vary the activation scaling parameter cCT reconstruction · PSNRMixedReLUs Are Sufficient for Learning Implicit Neural Representations (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 37 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • OpenWebText · 8 of 37 papers
  • ImageNet · 3 of 37 papers
  • RAVEL · 2 of 37 papers
  • COCO · 2 of 37 papers
  • RedPajama · 2 of 37 papers

Baselines

  • TopK SAE · 10 of 37 papers
  • ReLU SAE · 7 of 37 papers
  • JumpReLU SAE · 5 of 37 papers
  • BatchTopK SAE · 5 of 37 papers
  • Matryoshka SAE · 5 of 37 papers
  • Gated SAE · 5 of 37 papers
  • SIREN · 2 of 37 papers
  • ReLU MLP · 2 of 37 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 84 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 34 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy