AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Neural scaling laws

Fits scaling laws for model size, data, weight decay, and merging in language and vision.

155 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “memory · scaling · cost”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

39 papers in 2023–24 and 93 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.0% to 10.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 2172018: 1182019: 1192020: 2202021: 5212022: 12222023: 19232024: 20242025: 41252026: 5226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

98 papers here report 1,130 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 59%, no clear effect 14%, hurt 22%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Repeat UR50/S across epochs instead of using diverse, approximately single-epoch UniMeta200B dataOOD generalization and training loss · generalizationHurtTraining Compute-Optimal Protein Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations)
Increase the synthetic-to-real data ratio from 1:3 to 1:56 common test benchmarks · average word accuracy96.85 -> 95.70HurtAn Empirical Study of Scaling Law for Scene Text Recognition (CVPR 2024 · 11 citations)
Use a T5-XL text encoder with text-prefix design instead of CLIP without prefixHumanML3D · FID0.226 -> 0.104HelpedScaMo: Exploring the Scaling Law in Autoregressive Motion Generation Model (CVPR 2025 · 6 citations)
extract training features with the leave-one-fold-out strategy rather than vanilla extraction29 classification datasets · average rank5.97 -> 2.16HelpedA Closer Look at TabPFN v2: Understanding Its Strengths and Extending Its Capabilities (NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations)
Replace HSTU pointwise attention with softmaxSynthetic streaming · HR@10.0893 -> .0617HurtActions Speak Louder than Words: Trillion-Parameter Sequential Transducers for Generative Recommendations (ICML 2024 · 5 citations)
add atom and bond featuresCOMPAS-1D · MAE aEA0.0103(4e-04) -> 0.0093(4e-05)HelpedExploring Molecular Pretraining Model at Scale (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Reduce patch size to 6ImageNet-1 10-shot · performancesome absolute gainsMixedNavigating Scaling Laws: Compute Optimality in Adaptive Model Training (ICML 2024 · 4 citations)
include the 1.4B model in the downstream-error scaling fitRedPajama 6.9B, 138B tokens; 17-task split · average top-1 error relative prediction error10.64% -> 0.05%HelpedLanguage models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks (ICLR 2025 · 3 citations)
Use LVPS instead of no samplingBERT-Base training · acceleration ratio+9.3%HelpedPreparing Lessons for Progressive Training on Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Use the optimal-hyperparameter scaling law instead of fixed suboptimal hyperparametersValidation set · mean squared error4.31 ⇥ 10−7 -> 2.35 ⇥ 10−7HelpedTowards Precise Scaling Laws for Video Diffusion Transformers (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Use FP8 optimizer moments390M-token setup · final loss2.649 -> 2.645No clear effectTowards Fully FP8 GEMM LLM Training at Scale (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Add vocabulary sortingGemma 2 (2B), Alpaca, 8192 tokens · Loss+Gradient time159 ms -> 145 msHelpedCut Your Losses in Large-Vocabulary Language Models (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 52 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • C4 · 10 of 52 papers
  • FineWeb-Edu · 7 of 52 papers
  • OpenWebText · 6 of 52 papers
  • SlimPajama · 4 of 52 papers
  • DCLM-Baseline · 3 of 52 papers
  • ImageNet-1k · 2 of 52 papers
  • LibriSpeech · 2 of 52 papers
  • Paloma · 2 of 52 papers

Baselines

  • Chinchilla scaling law · 5 of 52 papers
  • OLMo2 · 2 of 52 papers
  • cosine schedule · 2 of 52 papers
  • WSD · 2 of 52 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 132 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy