AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Symmetry and equivariance in loss landscapes

Studies parameter symmetries and learns equivariance automatically in neural network architectures.

95 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “layer · activation · functions”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

23 papers in 2023–24 and 40 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.5% to 4.3%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 3172018: 7182019: 0192020: 5202021: 9212022: 8222023: 7232024: 16242025: 15252026: 2526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

63 papers here report 566 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 17%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
remove weight decaySix regression datasets · NRC1-NRC3HurtThe Prevalence of Neural Collapse in Neural Multivariate Regression (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use full symmetry-aware learned matching instead of permutation-only matchingCIFAR-100 · loss barrier0.53 ± 0.07 -> 0.00 ± 0.00HelpedGeneralized Linear Mode Connectivity for Transformers (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
rescale the diagonal parameter as √(n−1)θ₁ instead of parameterizing diagonal and off-diagonal components directlyS3 teacher-student setup · shape of the convergence-basin boundaryHelpedA Tale of Two Symmetries: Exploring the Loss Landscape of Equivariant Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Restrict analysis to decoder layers 11-16PASCAL VOC · mIoU0.75 -> 0.80HelpedDeciphering 'What' and 'Where' Visual Pathways from Spectral Clustering of Layer-Distributed Neural Representations (CVPR 2024 · 1 citation)
Add the pseudo-completion layerSynthetic data, most nontrivial cases of K and d · clustering accuracyan average of 50%HelpedDeep-Union Completion (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Use σ₀=0.01 instead of σ₀=0.1 while applying syre to the projection headCIFAR-100, linear evaluation, last layer · last-layer accuracy31.7% -> 32.5%HelpedRemove Symmetries to Control Model Expressivity and Improve Optimization (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add subtree flip matching to tree permutation matchingTabular-Benchmark (16 datasets), test · accuracy barrier0.811 ± 0.333 -> 0.455 ± 0.105HelpedLinear Mode Connectivity in Differentiable Tree Ensembles (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
score-based (lowest GIH geometry score) data removal instead of random removalCIFAR-10, 30% removed · test accuracy (%)+0.8 (62.5 vs 61.7)HelpedGeometric Inductive Biases of Deep Networks: The Role of Data and Architecture (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Reduce the penultimate-feature dimension from 640 to 10CIFAR100 · ECE (%)4.11 -> 11.04HurtTilt and Average : Geometric Adjustment of the Last Layer for Recalibration (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Add the alignment loss to trainingSine INRs · alignment performanceHurtEquivariant Deep Weight Space Alignment (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase the Monte-Carlo sample number k from 2 to 8Media · MJC63.1 ± 1.2 -> 66.8 ± 1.3HelpedHORSE: Hierarchical Representation for Large-Scale Neural Subset Selection (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
learn the group representation rather than use a fixed permutation-matrix representationS10 order prediction · accuracy87 ± 2 -> 100 ± 0HelpedMatrixNet: Learning over symmetry groups using learned group representations (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 23 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 23 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 4 of 23 papers
  • MNIST · 4 of 23 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 3 of 23 papers

Baselines

  • MLP · 2 of 23 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 63 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy