AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Why Regularized Auto-Encoders learn Sparse Representation?

ICML 2016 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Sparse dictionary representations · 13 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
constrain hidden weight length to one (ablation)DAE with ReLU · MNIST and CIFAR-10 patchesachievable sparsity (avg. activation fraction) before dead units: 0.1 -> 0.05Helped
constrain weight length to one for CAE and mDAE (ablation)CAE, mDAE with ReLU or Sigmoid · MNIST and CIFAR-10 patchespredictability of sparsity vs regularization coefficientHelped
increase regularization coefficient with zero bias gradient (ReLU, unit weights)CAE and mDAE · MNIST and CIFAR-10 patchesavg. activation fractionNo clear effect
increase corruption variance with ReLUDAE · MNIST and CIFAR-10 patchesavg. activation fractionHelped
use explicit first-order Taylor term of DAE (eDAE) (ablation)auto-encoder with ReLU · MNIST and CIFAR-10avg. activation fraction vs sigma^2Helped
increase regularization coefficient with positive bias gradient (Sigmoid, unit weights)AE models · MNIST and CIFAR-10 patchessparsityHelped

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy