AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Efficient network compression and training

Accelerates and compresses networks via memory-efficient backprop, structured shrinking, and parameter prediction.

229 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “memory · scaling · cost”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

67 papers in 2023–24 and 38 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 10.3% to 4.1%.

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-100 (accuracy, last in 2024); ImageNet (Top-1 accuracy, last in 2024); ImageNet (accuracy, last in 2024); CIFAR-100 (Top-1 accuracy (%), last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 17172018: 14182019: 17192020: 16202021: 32212022: 25222023: 33232024: 34242025: 23252026: 1526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

20 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 94.752019: 99
20182025

CIFAR-100 · accuracy (higher is better)

14 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 68.452019: 91.3
20182024

ImageNet · Top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

10 papers, 2016–2024 · not reported since 2024

2016: 47.12018: 73.22021: 79.352023: 83.61
20162024
YearBest so farSet by
201647.1Binarized Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2016 · 907 citations)
201873.2HydraNets: Specialized Dynamic Architectures for Efficient Inference (CVPR 2018 · 133 citations)
202179.35Minimally Invasive Surgery for Sparse Neural Networks in Contrastive Manner (CVPR 2021 · 2 citations)
202383.61DropIT: Dropping Intermediate Tensors for Memory-Efficient DNN Training (ICLR 2023 · 2 citations)

ImageNet · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 75.22020: 78.32022: 80
20182024
YearBest so farSet by
201875.2MorphNet: Fast & Simple Resource-Constrained Structure Learning of Deep Networks (CVPR 2018 · 344 citations)
202078.3Structured Multi-Hashing for Model Compression (CVPR 2020 · 11 citations)
202280Sharpness-Aware Training for Free (NeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations)

MNIST · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 992021: 99.252022: 99.4
20182025

CIFAR-100 · Top-1 accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 76.252023: 91.3
20182023
YearBest so farSet by
201876.25HydraNets: Specialized Dynamic Architectures for Efficient Inference (CVPR 2018 · 133 citations)
202391.3DropIT: Dropping Intermediate Tensors for Memory-Efficient DNN Training (ICLR 2023 · 2 citations)

What has been tried

201 papers here report 2,214 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 20%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove dataset distance from the regression modelTransfer-learning data · statistical significanceNo clear effectA Model for Estimating the Economic Costs of Computer Vision Systems That Use Deep Learning (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Increase trigger area from 7.91% to 14.06%CIFAR-10 · ASR91.29 -> 99.07HelpedDeep-TROJ: An Inference Stage Trojan Insertion Algorithm through Efficient Weight Replacement Attack (CVPR 2024 · 6 citations)
Increase retained explained variance from ε=0.8 to ε=0.9ImageNet-1k, 2 layers · accuracy61.7 -> 62.0HelpedActivation Map Compression through Tensor Decomposition for Deep Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
replace WS normalization with GNCIFAR10C L1 · accuracy83.2 -> 73.4HurtTinyTTA: Efficient Test-time Adaptation via Early-exit Ensembles on Edge Devices (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Add quantifiable physical information to error-compensation trainingMNIST · accuracy93.5% -> 96.5%HelpedPhysics-Constrained Comprehensive Optical Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
replace MobileBlock with FuseV2 MBMPII, 20-frame videos · activation count9.4M to 4.5MHelpedMEET: Towards Memory-Efficient Temporal Sparse Deep Neural Networks (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
distill three ancestry-model blocks instead of only the last blockImageNet-1K · accuracy44.27 -> 53.82 (6 blocks); 54.98 -> 60.44 (9 blocks)HelpedBuilding Variable-Sized Models via Learngene Pool (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Replace the linear trajectory objective with cosine or DDPM trajectoriesCIFAR-10 test, 1-Step · Top-1 accuracy (%)95.4±0.01 vs 94.7±0.01; 94.9±0.01HurtLayer Compression of Deep Networks with Straight Flows (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
set alpha to 2 instead of 4ImageNet · test error (%)24.32 -> 24.86HurtWhen to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
place the nonlinearity before the weights (pre-nonlinear ResNet) instead of after themCIFAR-10 · minimal log lossHurtTensor Programs VI: Feature Learning in Infinite Depth Neural Networks (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Apply late-stage rank adaptation with target ratio 0.8MNLI validation · accuracy63.3% -> 62.2%No clear effectCoMERA: Computing- and Memory-Efficient Training via Rank-Adaptive Tensor Optimization (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use three memory layers rather than onetraining set · nll2.11 -> 2.08HelpedMemory Layers at Scale (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 27 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet-1K · 5 of 27 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 4 of 27 papers
  • C4 · 3 of 27 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 27 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 27 papers
  • GLUE · 2 of 27 papers
  • COCO · 2 of 27 papers
  • FashionMNIST · 2 of 27 papers

Baselines

  • AdamW · 2 of 27 papers
  • PABEE · 2 of 27 papers
  • ZTW · 2 of 27 papers
  • MuE · 2 of 27 papers
  • JEI-DNN · 2 of 27 papers
  • Adam · 2 of 27 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 105 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy