AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Non-autoregressive translation

Speeds machine translation decoding with non-autoregressive models and efficient decoder designs.

102 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “end · differentiable · translation”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

10 papers in 2023–24 and 7 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 1.5% to 0.7%.

No longer reported by papers here: WMT14 De-En (BLEU, last in 2023); WMT14 En-De (BLEU, last in 2023); IWSLT14 De-En (BLEU, last in 2023); WMT16 En-Ro (BLEU, last in 2023); WMT'16 RO-EN (BLEU, last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 16172018: 10182019: 17192020: 16202021: 12212022: 10222023: 7232024: 3242025: 2252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

WMT14 De-En · BLEU (higher is better)

9 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 31.9
20182023
YearBest so farSet by
201831.9Model-Level Dual Learning (ICML 2018 · 33 citations)

WMT14 En-De · BLEU (higher is better)

9 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 28.9
20182023
YearBest so farSet by
201828.9Model-Level Dual Learning (ICML 2018 · 33 citations)

IWSLT14 De-En · BLEU (higher is better)

8 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 35.192020: 37
20182023
YearBest so farSet by
201835.19Model-Level Dual Learning (ICML 2018 · 33 citations)
202037Data Diversification: A Simple Strategy For Neural Machine Translation (NeurIPS 2020 · 43 citations)

WMT16 En-Ro · BLEU (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2023 · not reported since 2023

2019: 34.51
20192023
YearBest so farSet by
201934.51Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Enhanced Decoder Input (AAAI 2019 · 119 citations)

WMT'16 RO-EN · BLEU (higher is better)

4 papers, 2021–2023 · not reported since 2023

2021: 31.992022: 34.6
20212023

What has been tried

93 papers here report 1,017 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 20%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Reduce model size from 60M to 16M parametersFormula completion, 0.90 prefix · exact match0.70 -> 0.59HurtFLAME: A Small Language Model for Spreadsheet Formulas (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Use token-level instead of pooled global alignmentCSL-Daily test · BLEU-427.17 -> 27.42HelpedGeo-Sign: Hyperbolic Contrastive Regularisation for Geometrically Aware Sign Language Translation (NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations)
Exclude duration 0English leaderboard datasets (AVG) · WER (%)7.10 -> 6.98HelpedHAINAN: Fast and Accurate Transducer for Hybrid-Autoregressive ASR (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
TransformerIWSLT14 De->EnBLEU32.55 – 34.73 papers, e.g. AAAI 2019 and NeurIPS 2020
Vanilla NATWMT'14 EN-DEBLEU19.34 – 21.182 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and AAAI 2022
TransformerWMT16 EN→ROBLEU32.85 – 35.612 papers, e.g. AAAI 2020 and AAAI 2019

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 17 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 30 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy