AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Theory of depth and width

Analyzes exploding gradients, deep linear solutions, and expressive power of deep and wide networks.

223 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “layer · activation · functions”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 2 of 5 tracked benchmarks.

60 papers in 2023–24 and 61 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 9.2% to 6.5%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-10 (test accuracy, last in 2024); CIFAR-10 (accuracy, last in 2024); CIFAR-10 (Top-1 accuracy, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 3172018: 17182019: 15192020: 22202021: 17212022: 24222023: 35232024: 25242025: 32252026: 2926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ImageNet · Top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 56.62021: 72.92025: 76.61
20192025

ImageNet · Top-5 accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 79.42021: 86.42023: 88.92025: 93.14
20192025

CIFAR-10 · test accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 82.12021: 972024: 97.23
20182024

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 842021: 92.542023: 94.91
20192024

CIFAR-10 · Top-1 accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 94.72
20202024
YearBest so farSet by
202094.72Adaptive Convolutional ReLUs (AAAI 2020 · 10 citations)

What has been tried

178 papers here report 1,662 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 62%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 20%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
replace summation with star operationsImageNet-1k · Top-1 accuracy75.3 -> 78.4HelpedRewrite the Stars (CVPR 2024 · 612 citations)
Prune the KANFeynman I.9.18 · test RMSE1.48\times 10^{-3} -> 8.62\times 10^{-3}HurtKAN: Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks (ICLR 2025 · 535 citations)
Increase depthRandom-weight functions · Fourier complexityNo clear effectNeural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functions (CVPR 2024 · 9 citations)
Use γ<t instead of γ from all other layersMNIST · error (%)2.1 -> 2.2HurtLayer Collaboration in the Forward-Forward Algorithm (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
Add MGDL grades sequentially (grade 1 through grade 4)Cat, Sea, and Building test images · PSNRCat: 20.41 -> 22.67 -> 23.71 -> 24.18; Sea: 18.62 -> 21.50 -> 23.42 -> 24.32; Building: 17.29 -> 18.9HelpedAddressing Spectral Bias of Deep Neural Networks by Multi-Grade Deep Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Use 4 levels instead of 5Navier Stokes NS2 · L² error (×10⁻²)1.63 -> 2.10HurtMgNO: Efficient Parameterization of Linear Operators via Multigrid (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
Use grid extensionGaussian random field regression · regression lossHelpedOn the expressiveness and spectral bias of KANs (ICLR 2025 · 4 citations)
Introduce artificially imbalanced neuronal rotationtraining experiments · performanceHurtRotational Equilibrium: How Weight Decay Balances Learning Across Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Use non-negative weights with ReLU instead of activation switchingSynthetic function approximation · approximation qualityHurtAdvancing Constrained Monotonic Neural Networks: Achieving Universal Approximation Beyond Bounded Activations (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Random permutation of Mixer (RP-Mixer) vs normal MixerCIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, STL-10, ImageNet-1k · test errorMixedUnderstanding MLP-Mixer as a wide and sparse MLP (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Remove backpropagation through the DDN layersmall-scale datasets · performanceNo clear effectGuiding Neural Collapse: Optimising Towards the Nearest Simplex Equiangular Tight Frame (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Set the SOS batch size to 300 rather than 200CIFAR-100 · test accuracy72.91 ± 0.19 -> 73.35 ± 0.43HelpedImproving Generalization of Deep Neural Networks by Optimum Shifting (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 41 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 12 of 41 papers
  • MNIST · 9 of 41 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 6 of 41 papers
  • ImageNet · 5 of 41 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 4 of 41 papers
  • Tiny-ImageNet · 3 of 41 papers
  • SVHN · 2 of 41 papers
  • Wikitext-103 · 2 of 41 papers

Baselines

  • ReLU MLP · 2 of 41 papers
  • Adam · 2 of 41 papers
  • MLP · 2 of 41 papers
  • maximal update parameterization · 2 of 41 papers
  • Orthogonal initialization · 2 of 41 papers
  • Xavier initialization · 2 of 41 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 121 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy