AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Dataset distillation and data-efficient training

Condenses datasets and reuses pretrained models to cut training cost.

158 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “memory · scaling · cost”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

47 papers in 2023–24 and 46 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.2% to 4.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 3172018: 5182019: 9192020: 8202021: 17212022: 23222023: 20232024: 27242025: 36252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

138 papers here report 1,462 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 18%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add random-LTD to seqtru_voc curriculum learning1049B-token pretraining · GLUE score87.60±0.34 -> 87.69±0.32; 88.17±0.48MixedDeepSpeed Data Efficiency: Improving Deep Learning Model Quality and Training Efficiency via Efficient Data Sampling and Routing (AAAI 2024 · 23 citations)
Use zero PIP steps instead of oneMedium TSPTW-50 · Sol. infeasible rate4.53% -> 76.92%HurtLearning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing Problems (NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations)
use guided KD instead of supervised learningTSP-50 · optimality gap9.30% -> 0.36%; 7.69% -> 0.01%; 7.35% -> 0.05%HelpedDistilling Autoregressive Models to Obtain High-Performance Non-autoregressive Solvers for Vehicle Routing Problems with Faster Inference Speed (AAAI 2024 · 15 citations)
Add sampling network ψCIFAR-10, 50 IPC · accuracy (%)74.2 -> 77.4HelpedDataset Distillation with Neural Characteristic Function: A Minmax Perspective (CVPR 2025 · 13 citations)
retain only the top 10–20% by CLIP score rather than top 40%DataComp medium; 32M compute · average zero-shot accuracyHelpedScaling Laws for Data Filtering-- Data Curation cannot be Compute Agnostic (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
Replace the cumulative gradient transform cgf with cdfCIFAR10, noise 0.4 · sampler-search performanceHurtSwift Sampler: Efficient Learning of Sampler by 10 Parameters (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
Replace no weight adjustment with directed weight adjustmentCIFAR-100, ipc 10, ResNet-18 · Top-1 accuracy30.6 ± 0.7 -> 39.6 ± 0.6HelpedDiversity-Driven Synthesis: Enhancing Dataset Distillation through Directed Weight Adjustment (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Replace LoRA adaptation with hyper-networksMeta-World ML45 test (no-FT) · score0.20±0.01 -> 0.23±0.10HelpedThink Before You Act: Decision Transformers with Working Memory (ICML 2024 · 5 citations)
Use shared rather than random initialization for fitting each neural fieldNeural MNIST · test accuracy0.37±0.18 -> 0.72±0.17HelpedHow to Train Neural Field Representations: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmark (CVPR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add feature clipping to Group CalibrationCIFAR-10 · ECE (%)1.24 -> 1.78HurtFeature Clipping for Uncertainty Calibration (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Replace deterministic rules (DET) with hierarchical neural network (HNN) for drug interpretationFL and SL drugs (Table 7) · drug interpretation accuracy (%)RMP FL 76 to 94; INH FL 81 to 94; FLQ SL 66 to 88; KAC SL 62 to 95; LLK SL 76 to 98HelpedAutomatic Interpretation of Line Probe Assay Test for Tuberculosis (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Add replay-buffer samples to distillationImageNet-C Gaussian noise severity 3 · accuracy (%)47.4% -> 51.1%HelpedTowards Robust and Efficient Cloud-Edge Elastic Model Adaptation via Selective Entropy Distillation (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 39 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 10 of 39 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 10 of 39 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 5 of 39 papers
  • TinyImageNet · 4 of 39 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 39 papers
  • ImageNette · 2 of 39 papers
  • OpenWebText · 2 of 39 papers
  • ImageNet · 2 of 39 papers

Baselines

  • LoGra · 3 of 39 papers
  • MLP · 2 of 39 papers
  • DenseNet · 2 of 39 papers
  • ResNet · 2 of 39 papers
  • GradDot · 2 of 39 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 93 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy