atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Tuning the Frequencies: Robust Training for Sinusoidal Neural Networks

CVPR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Sparse dictionary representations · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes TUNER, a theory-grounded initialization and weight-bounding scheme for sinusoidal INRs based on an amplitude-phase (Fourier-like) expansion of 3-layer sinusoidal MLPs.

Problem

Initializing and training sinusoidal MLPs (SIREN-style implicit neural representations) is empirical, with unclear frequency generation across layers, leading to noisy reconstructions and overfitting when bandlimit is not controlled.

Approach

An amplitude-phase expansion shows each hidden neuron of a 3-layer sinusoidal MLP is a sum of sines at integer combinations of input frequencies, with amplitudes bounded by a function of hidden weights; this is used to initialize input frequencies as spectral sampling and to clamp/learn hidden-weight bounds that control the bandlimit during training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace uniform input-frequency initialization with TUNER spectral-sampling initializationSinusoidal INR · Kodak imagesSignal PSNR (dB): 32.2dB -> 36.2dB; 4dB improvementHelped
Add spectral-sampling initialization with low and high frequency regions; increase high-frequency share from 30% to 70% at l=21 (ablation)TUNER · Kodak imagesSignal PSNR (dB): 35.2 -> 35.0Hurt
Increase frequency split parameter l from 21 to 64 (ablation)TUNER · Kodak imagesSignal PSNR (dB): 35.2 -> 34.2 at 30%; 35.2 -> 30.8 at 70%Hurt
Add fixed bounds to hidden weights during training (ablation)TUNER · Kodak test pixels, b=256, cL=1.5, cH=0.05Signal PSNR (dB): 32.6 -> 34.8Helped
Add fixed bounds to hidden weights during training (ablation)TUNER · Kodak test pixels, b=256, cL=1.5, cH=0.05Gradient PSNR (dB): 14.5 -> 25.8Helped
Increase high-frequency hidden-weight bound cH from 0.05 to 0.2 (ablation)TUNER with fixed bounds, b=190 and cL=1.5 · Kodak test pixelsGradient PSNR (dB): 26.1 -> 21.0Hurt
Add regularization term Lreg to learned bounds (ablation)TUNER with learned bounds · Kodak imageRGB PSNR (dB): 27.4dB -> 28.5dBHelped
Add regularization term Lreg to learned bounds (ablation)TUNER with learned bounds · Kodak imageGradient PSNR (dB): 24.0dB -> 27.1dBHelped
Use TUNER instead of SIREN at b=256 with m=n=416Sinusoidal INR · Kodak train pixelsSignal PSNR (dB): 24.7 -> 41.2Helped
Use TUNER instead of SIREN at b=256 with m=n=416Sinusoidal INR · Kodak train pixelsGradient PSNR (dB): 12.9 -> 23.0Helped
Use TUNER instead of BACON at b=256 with m=n=416Sinusoidal INR · Kodak test pixelsGradient PSNR (dB): 22.8 -> 21.2Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Kodak dataset

Benchmarks: Kodak

Metrics: PSNR (signal) PSNR (gradient)

Baselines: SIREN BACON BANF Fourier feature mapping ReLU MLP

Builds on: SIREN Fourier feature mapping BACON Bessel function Fourier series expansion

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy