atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Tensor Programs VI: Feature Learning in Infinite Depth Neural Networks

ICLR 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Efficient network compression and training · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Classifies depthwise parametrizations of residual networks by their infinite-width-then-depth limits, identifies Depth-μP (branch multiplier 1/sqrt(depth)) as optimal for block depth 1, and shows fundamental limitations for block depth ≥2.

Problem

Depth scaling of residual networks: how to choose block multipliers and learning rates as depth grows so that features are stable, nontrivial, feature-diverse, and hyperparameters transfer across depth.

Approach

Extends μP to depth via infinite-width-then-depth limits: classifies all (branch multiplier L^-alpha, learning-rate L^-gamma) scalings, identifies alpha=gamma=1/2 (Depth-μP) as the unique optimal choice for single-layer blocks, proposes absolute-value nonlinearity to maximize feature diversity, and proves that block depth ≥2 cannot achieve the same optimality.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace ReLU with absolute valueDepth-μP block-depth-1 ResNet · CIFAR-10training performanceHelped
place the nonlinearity before the weights (pre-nonlinear ResNet) instead of after them (ablation)Depth-μP ResNet · CIFAR-10minimal log lossHurt
increase depth beyond 8 layersDepth-μP pre-nonlinear ResNet · CIFAR-10minimal log lossNo clear effect
use block depth 2 instead of block depth 1 (ablation)ReLU ResNet without layer normalization · CIFAR-10minimal log lossHurt
use block depth 2 instead of block depth 1 (ablation)Absolute-value ResNet with layer normalization · CIFAR-10minimal log lossHurt
use 1/L block scaling (ODE scaling) instead of Depth-μP scaling (ablation)ResNet · depth scaling experimentsoptimal learning rate transferHurt
increase the number of blocks under 1/√L scaling (ablation)Block-depth-2 ResNet · CIFAR-10hyperparameter transferHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 Common Crawl

Benchmarks: CIFAR-10 Common Crawl

Metrics: log loss validation loss

Baselines: Standard parametrization depth scaling ODE scaling (1/L block multiplier) Pre-nonlinearity ResNet ReLU ResNet

Builds on: μP Tensor Programs ResNet Megatron

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy