AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Neural-symbolic reasoning

Combines recurrent networks and differentiable optimization with symbolic reasoning and program synthesis.

98 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in RNNs and normalization, keyword cluster “end · differentiable · translation”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

23 papers in 2023–24 and 17 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 3.5% to 1.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 5172018: 8182019: 7192020: 13202021: 14212022: 9222023: 12232024: 11242025: 7252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

77 papers here report 781 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 21%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase encoding size Lkf=9 · accuracyHelpedEnd-to-End Learning of LTLf Formulae by Faithful LTLf Encoding (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Predict state-values instead of action-values1K puzzles (ablation setup) · Puzzle accuracy (%)83.3 -> 77.5HurtAmortized Planning with Large-Scale Transformers: A Case Study on Chess (NeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations)
Add the input projection stepVarying dimension and number of bound vector pairs · retrieval noise19.38 -> 7.18HelpedA Walsh Hadamard Derived Linear Vector Symbolic Architecture (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Add downstream-layer reconstruction loss to end-to-end KL and sparsity trainingGPT2-small residual stream before attention layer 6 · downstream reconstruction lossHelpedIdentifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Add end-to-end classifier gradients to guide SIREN meta-learningCIFAR-10 validation · accuracy38.98 -> 55.79HelpedEnd-to-End Implicit Neural Representations for Classification (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Remove the codebookSAR · accuracy99.27 -> 89.02HurtDiscrete Dictionary-based Decomposition Layer for Structured Representation Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
remove MI lossIOI · Logit DifferenceHurtIBCircuit: Towards Holistic Circuit Discovery with Information Bottleneck (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use a fully trainable mask independent of the code(31,16) and (32,11), Eb/N0=4 · -ln(BER)5.16 -> 4.83; 4.40 -> 4.04HurtLearning Linear Block Error Correction Codes (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
swap the left and right embeddingsS5 · Mean Accuracy99.99% -> 1%HurtGrokking Group Multiplication with Cosets (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Use dynamic rather than static embeddingsSR(U(10, 40)) unsat test · proven (%)14.72 -> 37.33; 25.38 -> 95.2; 28.72 -> 60.5HelpedLearning Better Representations From Less Data For Propositional Satisfiability (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
add balanced weighting to the loss8-task GLUE benchmark · average normalized score77.4 -> 85.3HelpedWhoever Started the interference Should End It: Guiding Data-Free Model Merging via Task Vectors (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 10 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 3 of 10 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 10 papers
  • SVHN · 2 of 10 papers
  • DTD · 2 of 10 papers

Baselines

  • MLP · 2 of 10 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 40 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy