AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

Photometric stereo

Estimates surface normals from varying illumination, including uncalibrated and non-Lambertian cases.

43 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Depth and stereo, keyword cluster “view stereo · photometric stereo · stereo matching”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

10 papers in 2023–24 and 7 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 3.3% to 1.7%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 4172018: 5182019: 3192020: 3202021: 4212022: 4222023: 4232024: 6242025: 4252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

39 papers here report 282 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 73%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 18%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add the photometric loss LpSMVP3D DRAGON · Chamfer distance5.17 -> 4.77HelpedNeRSP: Neural 3D Reconstruction for Reflective Objects with Sparse Polarized Images (CVPR 2024 · 13 citations)
add reflectance maps to the normal-based reconstructionDiLiGenT-MV average · Chamfer distance0.26 -> 0.23HelpedRNb-NeuS: Reflectance and Normal-based Multi-View 3D Reconstruction (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
add boundary-based light initialization instead of random initializationSynthetic dataset · PU-PSNR16.86 -> 22.06HelpedSpin-UP: Spin Light for Natural Light Uncalibrated Photometric Stereo (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)
Initialize learned patterns with flat gray instead of heuristic patterns3D-printed test dataset · reconstruction error0.3930 -> 0.0466HelpedDifferentiable Display Photometric Stereo (CVPR 2024 · 5 citations)
use optimal diffuse albedo instead of an MLP diffuse-albedo networktwo viewpoints, wide baseline · 3D reconstruction qualityHelpedSparse Views Near Light: A Practical Paradigm for Uncalibrated Point-light Photometric Stereo (CVPR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add vertex alignment to decimationDiLiGenT-MV, 1k vertices · RMSE (mm)1.64 -> 1.59HelpedFeature-Preserving Mesh Decimation for Normal Integration (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Add shape-based masks to exclude distorted event-profile regionsGlossy, Pole, and MulRefs · MAEHelpedPS-EIP: Robust Photometric Stereo Based on Event Interval Profile (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Add the FNIN integration network rather than using BiNI (k=0)DiLiGenT (10 objects) · MAE (mm)4.59 -> 4.23HelpedFNIN: A Fourier Neural Operator-based Numerical Integration Network for Surface-from-gradients (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
PS-NeRFDiLiGenT-MV, BuddhaChamfer distance0.28 – 0.3142 papers, e.g. CVPR 2024 and CVPR 2023

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 10 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • DiLiGenT-MV · 3 of 10 papers
  • DiLiGenT · 2 of 10 papers
  • LUCES · 2 of 10 papers

Baselines

  • SDM-UniPS · 4 of 10 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 17 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 33 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy