AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

Cost-volume multi-view stereo

Infers depth from multiple views with learned cost volumes, recurrent regularization and geometry-aware networks.

107 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Depth and stereo, keyword cluster “view stereo · photometric stereo · stereo matching”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 2 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

25 papers in 2023–24 and 32 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 8.2% to 7.8%.

Open questions the data points to

What looks settled

No longer reported by papers here: DTU evaluation set (Overall (mm), last in 2024); DTU (Overall, last in 2024); DTU evaluation (Overall (mm), last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 2172018: 4182019: 7192020: 13202021: 6212022: 16222023: 13232024: 12242025: 8252026: 2426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Tanks and Temples intermediate · Mean F-score (higher is better)

8 papers, 2020–2025 · still improving

2020: 54.832022: 64.362024: 67.032025: 68.16
20202025

DTU evaluation set · Overall (mm) (lower is better)

6 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 0.3522022: 0.3052023: 0.297
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
20210.352PatchmatchNet: Learned Multi-View Patchmatch Stereo (CVPR 2021 · 424 citations)
20220.305TransMVSNet: Global Context-Aware Multi-View Stereo Network With Transformers (CVPR 2022 · 264 citations)
20230.297Multi-View Stereo Representation Revist: Region-Aware MVSNet (CVPR 2023 · 28 citations)

Tanks-and-Temples advanced · Mean F-score (higher is better)

6 papers, 2022–2025 · flat since 2024

2022: 372024: 44.82
20222025

DTU · Overall (lower is better)

5 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 0.3512022: 0.2982024: 0.287
20202024

DTU evaluation · Overall (mm) (lower is better)

5 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 0.3552022: 0.295
20202023
YearBest so farSet by
20200.355Cascade Cost Volume for High-Resolution Multi-View Stereo and Stereo Matching (CVPR 2020 · 876 citations)
20220.295WT-MVSNet: Window-based Transformers for Multi-view Stereo (NeurIPS 2022 · 17 citations)

ETH3D test, 2cm · F1 (higher is better)

4 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 87.442024: 88.062025: 89.6
20232025

What has been tried

80 papers here report 835 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 3%, hurt 20%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add MCA to feature mapsScene Flow test ablation · EPE (px)0.458 -> 0.449HelpedMoCha-Stereo: Motif Channel Attention Network for Stereo Matching (CVPR 2024 · 86 citations)
add MGR-based monocular-stereo disparity fusion instead of convolution-based fusionScene Flow test · EPE (px)0.46 -> 0.43HelpedMonSter: Marry Monodepth to Stereo Unleashes Power (CVPR 2025 · 53 citations)
replace GCA with standard 3D convolutionDTU · Overall0.287 -> 0.315HurtGoMVS: Geometrically Consistent Cost Aggregation for Multi-View Stereo (CVPR 2024 · 45 citations)
add LSGPUnrealStereo4K overall · AvgErr18.81 -> 6.28HelpedLoS: Local Structure-Guided Stereo Matching (CVPR 2024 · 34 citations)
add rendering after causal predictionTUM RGB ATE RMSE (11 sequences) · ATE RMSE [cm]6.0 -> 4.5HelpedMUSt3R: Multi-view Network for Stereo 3D Reconstruction (CVPR 2025 · 32 citations)
add matching-cost patch deformation and multi-scale consistencyETH3D · F181.27 -> 86.94HelpedSD-MVS: Segmentation-Driven Deformation Multi-View Stereo with Spherical Refinement and EM Optimization (AAAI 2024 · 28 citations)
Add intra-image featuresSceneFlow test · EPE (px)0.62 -> 0.54HelpedIINet: Implicit Intra-inter Information Fusion for Real-Time Stereo Matching (AAAI 2024 · 24 citations)
add the depth-edge aligned priorETH3D, 2cm · F186.53 -> 88.67HelpedDVP-MVS: Synergize Depth-Edge and Visibility Prior for Multi-View Stereo (AAAI 2025 · 16 citations)
Add edge aggregation and edge refinementETH3D 2cm · F186.53 -> 88.09HelpedMSP-MVS: Multi-Granularity Segmentation Prior Guided Multi-View Stereo (AAAI 2025 · 13 citations)
Replace fixed sampling with the Plane IndicatorDTU testing set · Overall (mm)0.342 -> 0.322HelpedLearning Deformable Hypothesis Sampling for Accurate PatchMatch Multi-View Stereo (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
add intra-view geometric lossSceneFlow · EPE (px)0.765 -> 0.615HelpedLearning Intra-view and Cross-view Geometric Knowledge for Stereo Matching (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Add R-SADTU test · Overall error (mm)0.318 -> 0.299HelpedRRT-MVS: Recurrent Regularization Transformer for Multi-View Stereo (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
MVSFormer++Tanks-and-Temples intermediateMean F-score59.33 – 67.185 papers, e.g. CVPR 2024 and AAAI 2025

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 14 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ETH3D · 4 of 14 papers
  • ARKitScenes · 4 of 14 papers
  • ScanNet++ · 4 of 14 papers
  • BlendedMVS · 3 of 14 papers
  • WildRGB-D · 3 of 14 papers
  • CO3D · 3 of 14 papers
  • Tanks & Temples · 2 of 14 papers
  • Tanks and Temples · 2 of 14 papers

Baselines

  • MVSTER · 4 of 14 papers
  • PatchMatchNet · 3 of 14 papers
  • EPNet · 3 of 14 papers
  • ACMM · 3 of 14 papers
  • ACMP · 3 of 14 papers
  • ACMMP · 3 of 14 papers
  • SD-MVS · 3 of 14 papers
  • APD-MVS · 3 of 14 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 57 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy