atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Validating Climate Models with Spherical Convolutional Wasserstein Distance

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Prediction-powered and conformal inference · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes the spherical convolutional Wasserstein distance (SCWD), a functional sliced Wasserstein distance using Wendland-kernel convolution slices on the sphere, to validate CMIP5/CMIP6 climate models against reanalysis and observations.

Problem

Existing climate model validation metrics (RMSE, correlation, or spatial-mean Wasserstein distance) either ignore distributional differences or discard spatial variability, and sliced Wasserstein methods are defined for vectors or square images, not spherical fields.

Approach

Extends the convolutional sliced Wasserstein distance to functions on the unit sphere by defining a functional sliced WD with radial (chordal-distance) Wendland kernel convolution slicers, then averages local univariate Wasserstein distances over the sphere to get a global, spatially resolved similarity measure.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use CMIP6 instead of CMIP5 modelsClimate model simulations · Surface temperature to ERA5median SCWDHelped
Use CMIP6 instead of CMIP5 modelsClimate model simulations · Precipitation to GPCPmedian SCWDHelped
Use SCWD with local spatial slices instead of global mean-based WDClimate model validation · Surface temperature to ERA5similarity rankingHelped
Use SCWD with local spatial slices instead of global mean-based WDClimate model validation · Precipitation to GPCPsimilarity rankingHelped
Vary the Wendland kernel range from 1,000 km to 500 km or 2,500 km (ablation)SCWD model rankings · CMIP6 surface temperature and precipitationmodel rankingNo clear effect
Increase the Wendland kernel range (ablation)SCWD model rankings · CMIP6 precipitationmodel rankingHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CMIP5 historical outputs CMIP6 historical outputs ERA5 reanalysis NCEP/DOE Reanalysis-2 GPCP daily precipitation

Benchmarks: CMIP5 and CMIP6 historical surface temperature vs ERA5 CMIP5 and CMIP6 total precipitation vs GPCP

Metrics: SCWD (spherical convolutional Wasserstein distance) GMWD model rankings

Baselines: global mean-based Wasserstein distance (GMWD) RMSE NCEP Reanalysis-2 (as reference model)

Builds on: sliced Wasserstein distance convolutional sliced Wasserstein distance generalized sliced Wasserstein distance global mean-based Wasserstein distance

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy