AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

SGD noise and flat minima

Analyzes how stochastic gradient noise structure and learning rate steer SGD toward flat minima.

112 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “sgd · sharpness · noise”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 15 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 12.3% to 5.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 4172018: 7182019: 6192020: 14202021: 12212022: 22222023: 14232024: 15242025: 11252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

99 papers here report 718 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 53%, no clear effect 14%, hurt 24%, mixed 9%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase weight decayCifar10, Cifar100, ImageNet · convergenceHurtInvestigating the Role of Weight Decay in Enhancing Nonconvex SGD (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase SAM radius from ρ = 0.01 to ρ = 0.1Two-layer ReLU network training · Coherence Measure121.473 -> 65.656HurtA Unified Stability Analysis of SAM vs SGD: Role of Data Coherence and Emergence of Simplicity Bias (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the free parameter \tilde\kappaSmallest-eigenvalue subspace · bias decay rateHelpedRisk Bounds of Accelerated SGD for Overparameterized Linear Regression (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Aggressively decay the learning rateWalker2d-v4 · rollout reward oscillationsHelpedButterfly Effects of SGD Noise: Error Amplification in Behavior Cloning and Autoregression (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase the learning rate from η=0.1 to η=1.2Synthetic test data · testing accuracy93.75% -> 99.38%HelpedBenign Oscillation of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Large Learning Rate (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Decrease α from 1.9 to 1.75 with Type-I noiseECG5000, n=10K · pruning ratio30.05± 8.12 -> 60.23± 17.85HelpedImplicit Compressibility of Overparametrized Neural Networks Trained with Heavy-Tailed SGD (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
replace the out-of-batch construction with the direct-generalization estimator using K^{-1}AHuber regression, SGD with batch size n/10 · risk-estimation accuracyHurtEstimating Generalization Performance Along the Trajectory of Proximal SGD in Robust Regression (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 11 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 4 of 11 papers

Baselines

  • SGD · 2 of 11 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 44 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy