AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Stability-based generalization analysis

Bounds generalization of gradient-trained networks through algorithmic stability and Bayesian arguments.

88 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “sgd · sharpness · noise”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

14 papers in 2023–24 and 15 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 6.0% to 5.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 6172018: 6182019: 11192020: 15202021: 9212022: 10222023: 9232024: 5242025: 8252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

69 papers here report 581 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 60%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 23%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add second-derivative information to ReLU (augmented ReLU)ImageNet · test accuracyHelpedNeglected Hessian component explains mysteries in sharpness regularization (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use second-order instead of first-order multiple integration (MIAdam2)CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 classification · top-1 test accuracyResNet50 CIFAR-10: 94.17 (± 0.10) -> 94.28 (± 0.15); DenseNet121 CIFAR-100: 77.02 (±0.10) -> 76.21 (±0.33)MixedA Method for Enhancing Generalization of Adam by Multiple Integrations (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Increase gating depth from D=2 to D=4VGG-16 (CIFAR-10) · theoretical speed-up within 5% / 10% of max. test accuracy16.13 / 52.70 -> 18.88 / 48.97MixedDifferentiable Sparsity via $D$-Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured Penalization (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Replace Softmax with StableMax in the attention mechanismWikiText-103 · Top-5 accuracy60.48% ± 0.04 -> 58.52% ± 0.04HurtGrokking at the Edge of Numerical Stability (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Upsample selected examples with USEFUL instead of random examplesCIFAR10 and CIFAR100 · test errorHelpedChanging the Training Data Distribution to Reduce Simplicity Bias Improves In-distribution Generalization (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
add acceleration term a_m to mCIFAR10, batch 16384 · top-1 accuracy (%)87.06 -> 88.83HelpedExploring Landscapes for Better Minima along Valleys (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Standard initialization scale with sigmoid output vs large initializationMNIST generalization speed · steps to generalization10^2 instead of 10^5 stepsHelpedDeep Learning Through A Telescoping Lens: A Simple Model Provides Empirical Insights On Grokking, Gradient Boosting & Beyond (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Reduce the Gauss-Newton learning rateCIFAR-10, mini-batch · training and test lossNo clear effectExact, Tractable Gauss-Newton Optimization in Deep Reversible Architectures Reveal Poor Generalization (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 10 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 6 of 10 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 4 of 10 papers
  • MNIST · 3 of 10 papers
  • ImageNet-1k · 2 of 10 papers

Baselines

  • Adam · 2 of 10 papers
  • AdamW · 2 of 10 papers
  • SGD · 2 of 10 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 29 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy