AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Edge-of-stability dynamics

Characterizes gradient descent at large step sizes where sharpness hovers at the stability threshold.

116 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “sgd · sharpness · noise”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 45 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 11.1% to 17.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 6182019: 8192020: 4202021: 14212022: 12222023: 15232024: 11242025: 24252026: 2126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

88 papers here report 764 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 55%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 26%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
initialize the second moment randomly with the same norm as the initial gradientsreported training settings · performanceHelpedWhy Warmup the Learning Rate? Underlying Mechanisms and Improvements (NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations)
Use GeLU instead of ReLUMNIST, varying hidden widths · Koopman spectral similarityNo clear effectIdentifying Equivalent Training Dynamics (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Set CDAT scaling near 2 instead of greedy scaling 1Full-batch deep-learning experiments · training lossHelpedStepping on the Edge: Curvature Aware Learning Rate Tuners (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add bias terms to neuronsModified 2D Rosenbrock regression · frequency of plateau saddlesHurtFlat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss Landscapes (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
increase weight decayteacher-student representation alignment · representation alignmentHurtNeural Thermodynamics: Entropic Forces in Deep and Universal Representation Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the fraction of rule-flipped readout neuronsConvergence speed as flipped-neuron fraction varies · convergence speedHurtCurl Descent : Non-Gradient Learning Dynamics with Sign-Diverse Plasticity (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Lower the base learning rate from 10^{-3} to 10^{-4}Three input and three output neurons · Frobenius error to identityHelpedSpike-timing-dependent Hebbian learning as noisy gradient descent (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use the FSL-optimal learning-rate schedule instead of WSD schedules with stable-to-decay ratios 3:1, 4:1, or 5:120B tokens · final lossapproximately 0.01HelpedFunctional Scaling Laws in Kernel Regression: Loss Dynamics and Learning Rate Schedules (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove logits from the mode-connectivity feature vectorsCIFAR-10/100, FGSM, BIM, and PGD · accuracy/AUC (%)HurtInput Space Mode Connectivity in Deep Neural Networks (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use Beta (2, 2) sampling instead of uniform interpolation samplingCIFAR-10, ResNet-18 · star-regular loss barrier0.084 ± 0.012 -> 0.069 ± 0.010No clear effectDo Deep Neural Network Solutions Form a Star Domain? (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
project each SGD update onto the dominant subspaceMNIST-5k, CIFAR10-5k, and SST2-1k · training lossHurtDoes SGD really happen in tiny subspaces? (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove teleportation and learn only the local updateTwo-layer LeakyReLU network optimization · convergence rateHurtImproving Convergence and Generalization Using Parameter Symmetries (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 30 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 12 of 30 papers
  • MNIST · 6 of 30 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 30 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 3 of 30 papers
  • ImageNet · 3 of 30 papers
  • synthetic Gaussian data · 2 of 30 papers

Baselines

  • gradient flow · 3 of 30 papers
  • SGD · 3 of 30 papers
  • gradient descent · 2 of 30 papers
  • ADAM · 2 of 30 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 71 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy