AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Towards Theoretically Understanding Why Sgd Generalizes Better Than Adam in Deep Learning

NeurIPS 2020 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: SGD noise and flat minima · 56 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase basin Radon measure (basin volume)SGD SDE · Toy basins A, B, and Caverage iterations for successful escaping: 122 -> 457 -> 1898Hurt
Increase basin Radon measure (basin volume)SGD SDE · Toy basins A, B, and Cescaping probability: 100% -> 65.6% -> 10.1%Hurt
Use anisotropic gradient noise without adaptive coordinate scaling instead of Adam-style geometry adaptationSGD versus Adam · Local basin escapingescaping timeHelped
Smooth gradient noise with an exponential moving averageAdam versus SGD · Local basin escapingescaping timeHurt
Use heavy-tailed Levy noise rather than Gaussian noise to model gradient noiseSGD and Adam SDEs · AlexNet on CIFAR10gradient-noise fitHelped
Use SGD rather than AdamFully connected networks · MNIST and CIFAR10test accuracyHelped
Use SGD rather than AdamFully connected networks · MNIST and CIFAR10basin-transition behaviorMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy