AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Neural tangent kernel analysis

Uses NTK and linearization theory to analyze training, feature learning, and inductive bias in wide networks.

114 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “relu · width · kernel”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 29 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 12.3% to 11.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 6182019: 6192020: 16202021: 18212022: 10222023: 18232024: 11242025: 15252026: 1426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

84 papers here report 574 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 58%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 22%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use finest variable splitting (|ξ| = 1, p = 2) instead of coarser splitting (|ξ| = 2, p = 3)Fourth-order elastic beam equation · training loss reductionHelpedHow does PDE order affect the convergence of PINNs? (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Increase ReLU network depthSynthetic, MNIST, FashionMNIST, SVHN, Librispeech · NTK condition numberHelpedBetter NTK Conditioning: A Free Lunch from (ReLU) Nonlinear Activation in Wide Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Give covariance and cumulant spikes a finite overlap u·v = ρ, while keeping latent variables uncorrelatedMCM · speed of learning the non-Gaussian partNo clear effectSliding Down the Stairs: How Correlated Latent Variables Accelerate Learning with Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Shifted-ReLU experiments: Setting 2 (H1 + H2/sqrt2 target) vs Setting 1 (linear only) across log(eta)/log(n)synthetic, n=1000, N=500, d=300 · train/test error vs log(eta)/log(n)MixedA Theory of Non-Linear Feature Learning with One Gradient Step in Two-Layer Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Set the last-layer inference step-size exponent to 0 instead of -1FashionMNIST · inference stability across widthsHurtLocal Loss Optimization in the Infinite Width: Stable Parameterization of Predictive Coding Networks and Target Propagation (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Replace the isotropic prior with a source condition, 1<b<a+1Power-law spectrum, source condition · population risk above irreducible riskM^{1-b} + (N_eff γ)^{(1-b)/a} + min{M,(N_eff γ)^{1/a}}/N_effMixedScaling Laws in Linear Regression: Compute, Parameters, and Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use no regularization instead of weight decay or AGOP regularizationModular addition, p = 61 · test accuracydoes not go to 100%HurtEmergence in non-neural models: grokking modular arithmetic via average gradient outer product (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
add IDIZC to the identity-only initializationCIFAR-10 · accuracy87.01 -> 92.9HelpedIDInit: A Universal and Stable Initialization Method for Neural Network Training (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add a learning-rate warm-up phaseCINIC-10, 50 epochs · validation accuracyHelpedOn the Weight Dynamics of Deep Normalized Networks (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
use Tanh activationCIFAR-10 · feature diversity as width increasesHurtGlobal Convergence and Rich Feature Learning in $L$-Layer Infinite-Width Neural Networks under $\mu$ Parametrization (ICML 2025)
use Softplus instead of ReLUNeural ODE training · convergence speedHelpedGlobal Convergence in Neural ODEs: Impact of Activation Functions (ICLR 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 20 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 6 of 20 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 6 of 20 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 20 papers
  • FashionMNIST · 2 of 20 papers
  • SVHN · 2 of 20 papers
  • SST2 · 2 of 20 papers

Baselines

  • gradient descent · 2 of 20 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 58 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy