AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Implicit bias in linear networks

Characterizes the max-margin-like solutions gradient flow selects in linear and separable classification settings.

53 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “implicit bias · regularization · bias gradient”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

14 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 6.0% to 6.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 3182019: 1192020: 3202021: 8212022: 6222023: 5232024: 9242025: 8252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

33 papers here report 218 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 56%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 21%, mixed 11%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase batch size from 32 to 512 during trainingCIFAR-5m online · loss trajectory alignmentHelpedBeyond Implicit Bias: The Insignificance of SGD Noise in Online Learning (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Decrease the dataset scaling εSparse regression with unbiased initialization · squared parameter distance to ground truthHelpedEffects of Momentum in Implicit Bias of Gradient Flow for Diagonal Linear Networks (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
vary the unscaled potential among x^2, |x|^3 + x^2, and x^4 + x^2common data set · implicit biasNo clear effectImplicit Bias of Mirror Flow for Shallow Neural Networks in Univariate Regression (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the number of training samples (n=1000, 10000, 50000)Synthetic multi-cluster dataset · feature averagingNo clear effectFeature Averaging: An Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent Leading to Non-Robustness in Neural Networks (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Incrementally increase sampling ratio and intervalKodak (8 representative images) · Time (s)345.22 -> 211.04HelpedNonparametric Teaching of Implicit Neural Representations (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Replace the identity cost matrix with a diagonal Q having only q1 positiveUnseen initial states · extrapolationzero Q-optimality and cost measuresHelpedImplicit Bias of Policy Gradient in Linear Quadratic Control: Extrapolation to Unseen Initial States (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase network widthMNIST and CIFAR10, low-sample binary classification · test accuracyHelpedBias of Stochastic Gradient Descent or the Architecture: Disentangling the Effects of Overparameterization of Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase co-correlation from 0.25 to 0.83 by altering weight initializationMNIST test set · accuracy0.93 to 0.68HurtThe Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent toward Collaboration between Layers: A Dynamic Analysis of Multilayer Perceptions (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase environment heterogeneityMatrix sensing simulation · Signal recovery proportionHelpedThe Implicit Bias of Heterogeneity towards Invariance: A Study of Multi-Environment Matrix Sensing (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Add stability constant ε = 10^{-8} to AdamSynthetic separable data (logistic loss) · normalized ℓ∞-marginNo clear effectThe Implicit Bias of Adam on Separable Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 10 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 10 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 10 papers

Baselines

  • gradient descent · 2 of 10 papers
  • gradient flow · 2 of 10 papers
  • signGD · 2 of 10 papers
  • Adam · 2 of 10 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 32 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy