AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Low-rank and single-index recovery

Analyzes gradient descent on matrix sensing, factorization, and single-index models with global guarantees.

70 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “relu · width · kernel”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

22 papers in 2023–24 and 21 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 9.4% to 8.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 5172018: 5182019: 5192020: 4202021: 2212022: 3222023: 8232024: 14242025: 10252026: 1126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

53 papers here report 282 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 19%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add one extra parameterization layer (D=1)Sequence model (p=1, q=2, gamma=1.1) · convergence rate0.48 -> 0.49HelpedImproving Adaptivity via Over-Parameterization in Sequence Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Modify the noise spectrum while leaving the problem unregularizedAlignment mismatch ablation · generalization riskNo clear effectLeast Squares Regression Can Exhibit Under-Parameterized Double Descent (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
replace exponentially decaying step sizes with constant step size and averaged iteratesHigh-dimensional and asymptotic settings · excess risk\frac{1}{n^2\eta_0^s}HurtLearning Curves of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Kernel Regression (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
increase widthAntiderivative · training lossHelpedOptimization for Neural Operators can Benefit from Width (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use a learning rate of 10^{-3} instead of 10^{-4} or smallerSynthetic optimization, T=20 · relative objective improvementHurtLearning Provably Improves the Convergence of Gradient Descent (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Perturb Nyström initialization by adding residual-space noiseSymmetric exact-parametrized matrix factorization · convergence ratequadratic -> linearHurtOn the Crucial Role of Initialization for Matrix Factorization (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Set the learning rate to 0.0025 rather than 0.001 or 0.005Vandermonde V · probability of r reaching approximately 1HelpedSymmetric Single Index Learning (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Use the tailor-designed initialization instead of RI initializationReLU MC, σ = 0 · completion error γ_T0.5 ± 0.13 -> (7.6 ± 0.7) · 10^{-11}HelpedSymmetric Matrix Completion with ReLU Sampling (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 12 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • kernel ridge regression · 2 of 12 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 43 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy