AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Explicit and implicit regularization interplay

Studies how weight decay, gradient regularizers, and training dynamics jointly induce implicit regularization.

63 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Implicit bias and generalization, keyword cluster “implicit bias · regularization · bias gradient”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

13 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 5.5% to 6.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 3182019: 8192020: 7202021: 9212022: 5222023: 5232024: 8242025: 9252026: 926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

49 papers here report 396 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 60%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 26%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Replace decoupled weight decay with an L2 penaltyOpenWebText · training lossNo clear effectWhy Do We Need Weight Decay in Modern Deep Learning? (NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations)
Add a high-noise training phase before low-noise fittingMatrix completion across ε values · rank-1 recoveryHelpedImplicit bias of SGD in $L_2$-regularized linear DNNs: One-way jumps from high to low rank (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
use EGO(nice) instead of EGO(geo)Traditional global optimization functions, D=50 · optimum objective value1.80E+01 -> 4.04E-03 (Ackley's); 1.85E+00 -> 2.26E-02 (Rastrigin's)HelpedExplicit and Implicit Graduated Optimization in Deep Neural Networks (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
increase isotropic Gaussian posterior varianceCIFAR-10 MLP · sharpnessHelpedVariational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace Rademacher initialization with Gaussian initializationFull parity, uniform inputs · accuracyperfect accuracy -> ≤ 1/2+exp(-Ω(d))HurtLearning High-Degree Parities: The Crucial Role of the Initialization (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use the PILoT initialization instead of the spred initializationdiagonal linear network · distance to ground truthHelpedMask in the Mirror: Implicit Sparsification (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase factorization depth from 2 to 3Fashion-MNIST, at the same test accuracy · compression ratioup to four times sparserHelpedDeep Weight Factorization: Sparse Learning Through the Lens of Artificial Symmetries (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
remove the learned vector fieldAdult · accuracy84.28% -> 84.21%HurtDeep Sturm–Liouville: From Sample-Based to 1D Regularization with Learnable Orthogonal Basis Functions (ICML 2025)
Replace L1 or nuclear-norm regularization with L2 regularizationSparse recovery and matrix completion with N < n · generalizationHurtGrokking Beyond the Euclidean Norm of Model Parameters (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 12 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 5 of 12 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 12 papers
  • CIFAR100 · 3 of 12 papers
  • ImageNet · 3 of 12 papers

Baselines

  • AdamW · 2 of 12 papers
  • Adam · 2 of 12 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 31 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy