AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Determinantal point process inference

Scalable MAP inference and learning for determinantal point processes and related online methods.

122 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “selection · robust · test”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

27 papers in 2023–24 and 29 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 5.0% to 5.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 6172018: 9182019: 9192020: 13202021: 13212022: 12222023: 12232024: 15242025: 14252026: 1526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

96 papers here report 777 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 19%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove SAC from B2OptF4-F9, d=10 · objective valueF4 3.03(5.82) vs 52.7(15.0); F5 1.02(0.20) vs 5.08(0.98); F6 4e3(7e4) vs 1e5(9e4); F7 44.8(8.34) vs 47.2(5.11); F8 0.60(HurtB2Opt: Learning to Optimize Black-box Optimization with Little Budget (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Set shrinking frequency to 0.004 rather than disable region shrinkingAckley, n=500, 30n calls · function value5.8 ± 0.1 -> 1.7 ± 0.4HelpedScalable Acceleration for Classification-Based Derivative-Free Optimization (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Increase embedding dimension from d=4 to d=10P1 regret (N=500, q=5, σ=1) · regret83 -> 148HurtSample-Constrained Black Box Optimization for Audio Personalization (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Use a larger validation set for uncertainty-set calibrationSynthetic shortest path and knapsack · coverage calibrationHelpedConformal Inverse Optimization (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Amortize log-pdf calls in the elliptical slice samplerReal Estate UCI · speed-up2×HelpedEfficiently Vectorized MCMC on Modern Accelerators (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
vary p across 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32Uniform vs Uniform; Uniform vs Gaussian; Taxi Pickup vs Dropoff · approximation quality and update timeMixedFully Dynamic Euclidean Bi-Chromatic Matching in Sublinear Update Time (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase penalty constant γBLO PEFT learning phase (S1) · DPO lossHurtBeyond Value Functions: Single-Loop Bilevel Optimization under Flatness Conditions (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
replace QUIVER with Accelerated QUIVER, placing two quantization values per dynamic-program stepNormal and LogNormal input vectors · runtimeup to 5.4×HelpedOptimal and Approximate Adaptive Stochastic Quantization (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Use PermK instead of independent RandK compressors for downlinkNon-homogeneous quadratics · s2w communication complexity\frac{d \delta^0 \frac{1}{n} \sum (i=1)^n \norm{\mathbf{A}_i}}{\sqrt{n} \varepsilon} + \frac{d \delta^0 \max (i\in[n])HelpedImproving the Worst-Case Bidirectional Communication Complexity for Nonconvex Distributed Optimization under Function Similarity (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
use 2:1 direction splitting instead of lookahead direction selectionIllustrative function from direction-selection example · regret5.68 \times 10^{-10} -> 1.8 \times 10^{-4}HurtAdaptive Partitioning Schemes for Optimistic Optimization (ICML 2025)
Add the model error term to the objective functionz500 analysis, cyclic forecasting · RMSEabove 200 m2/s2 after a weekHelpedTowards a Self-contained Data-driven Global Weather Forecasting Framework (ICML 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 2 of 17 papers

Baselines

  • CMA-ES · 3 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 56 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy