AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Ranking models from comparisons

Model and infer rankings and preferences from pairwise or partial comparisons, e.g. Mallows models.

127 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “ranking · nearest · neighbor”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

24 papers in 2023–24 and 26 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 4.5% to 4.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 5162017: 11172018: 12182019: 17192020: 7202021: 13212022: 12222023: 11232024: 13242025: 14252026: 1226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

104 papers here report 870 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 21%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Replace linear RankSVM with non-linear RankSVMLCBench 32 datasets · end-to-end HPO performanceNo clear effectInteractive Hyperparameter Optimization in Multi-Objective Problems via Preference Learning (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Add per-item parameters to the contextual modelImageClarity, WiscAds, and IMDB-WIKI-SbS · holdout comparison errorHelpedActive preference learning for ordering items in- and out-of-sample (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Replace Sibling ranking with Outshines rankingDelphi daily deployment · maximally tied outliers14k ± 1.7k -> 21 ± 5.5HelpedOutlier Ranking for Large-Scale Public Health Data (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Use multiple anchor selection vectors rather than oneDiginetica · approximation error19.2% to 15.2%HelpedWould You Like Your Data to Be Trained? A User Controllable Recommendation Framework (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
add L_e2e to LCRONRecFlow Period 1 last-day test, two-stage cascade · Joint Recall@10@200.8710 ± 0.0013 -> 0.8732 ± 0.0005HelpedLearning Cascade Ranking as One Network (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Include tied pairs in standard DPO trainingNMT and TL;DR · task performanceHurtOn Extending Direct Preference Optimization to Accommodate Ties (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add YouTube channel embeddingsTournesol YouTube comparisons, validation (10-fold CV) · validation risk10.1 \cdot 10^{-3} -> 8.40 \cdot 10^{-3}; 17% reductionHelpedGeneralizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use backtracking during noisy insertion search instead of naive insertion without backtrackingSynthetic seriation scenarios 1–4 · probability of errorHelpedActive Seriation: Efficient Ordering Recovery with Statistical Guarantees (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase user-random-choice probability ζMovieLens10M and ACSEmployment · overall lossHurtLearning from Streaming Data when Users Choose (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
larger subset sizes and wider inter-alternative gapsMTurk pilot · ground-truth recoveryHelpedThe Surprising Effectiveness of SP Voting with Partial Preferences (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 16 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • DPO · 3 of 16 papers
  • IPO · 3 of 16 papers
  • Borda · 2 of 16 papers
  • RLHF · 2 of 16 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 50 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy