AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Conformal prediction sets

Construct prediction sets with coverage guarantees and improved efficiency or conditional validity.

116 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “conformal · predictions · online”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 90 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.0% to 15.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 0182019: 2192020: 0202021: 2212022: 5222023: 6232024: 10242025: 35252026: 5526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

56 papers here report 492 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 61%, no clear effect 13%, hurt 19%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase average conformal set size from 2.49 to 2.77GoEmotions · human accuracy59.1±1.2% -> 56.9±1.3%HurtConformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making (ICML 2024 · 8 citations)
Remove the labeling-guided selection and use a small clean reference setVisual datasets, α=0.03, contamination 1% · Power (relative to Standard)1.041 (± 0.0177) -> 0.714 (± 0.0448)HurtRobust Conformal Outlier Detection under Contaminated Reference Data (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Increase εQuestion answering on SQuAD · coverage rateHurtConformal Structured Prediction (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
use classwise lambdasACSIncome · disparate impact0.815 -> 0.797HurtA Generic Framework for Conformal Fairness (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
add change-point-triggered learning-rate resetsM4 time series · variance1.320579 -> 1.144337HelpedOnline conformal prediction with decaying step sizes (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use harmonic-mean aggregation rather than arithmetic mean, geometric mean, or quantile aggregationAppendix C aggregation comparison · interval lengthHelpedFalse Coverage Proportion Control for Conformal Prediction (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add order-preserving constraint to ConfTr (ft.)CIFAR-100 · tuning bias6.15 ± 0.86 -> 0.52 ± 0.37HelpedParametric Scaling Law of Tuning Bias in Conformal Prediction (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use k=5 instead of k=1 intervalsSimulated data (1D features) · average volume1.14 -> 0.45HelpedVolume Optimality in Conformal Prediction with Structured Prediction Sets (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace Mean Imputation with kNN or MICESimulation · coverageNo clear effectConformal Prediction with Cellwise Outliers: A Detect-then-Impute Approach (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
use the quantile envelope instead of the linear envelopeSynthetic data, m=500 · relative lengthHelpedTransductive Conformal Inference for Full Ranking (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use (f, U) auxiliary score distributions instead of (min, max)iWildCam · coverageincreased coverage by more than 7% on average; improved coverage by almost 10%HelpedNon-exchangeable Conformal Prediction with Optimal Transport: Tackling Distribution Shift with Unlabeled Data (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use APS score instead of TPSCIFAR-10, radius 0.06, coverage 0.90 · average set size2.70 ± 0.03 -> 2.98 ± 0.02HurtOne Sample is Enough to Make Conformal Prediction Robust (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 61 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 11 of 61 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 7 of 61 papers
  • MNIST · 7 of 61 papers
  • ImageNet · 6 of 61 papers
  • bio · 4 of 61 papers
  • blog · 4 of 61 papers
  • bike · 3 of 61 papers
  • ACSIncome · 3 of 61 papers

Baselines

  • CQR · 9 of 61 papers
  • CHR · 6 of 61 papers
  • PCP · 5 of 61 papers
  • RAPS · 4 of 61 papers
  • vanilla conformal prediction · 4 of 61 papers
  • split conformal prediction · 3 of 61 papers
  • ACI · 3 of 61 papers
  • APS · 3 of 61 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 106 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 33 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy