AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Theory of neural network sensitivity

Analyze learnability and robustness of networks through linear structure and Lipschitz control.

143 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “selection · robust · test”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

48 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 9.0% to 4.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 9172018: 8182019: 6192020: 16202021: 15212022: 12222023: 24232024: 24242025: 15252026: 1226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

116 papers here report 1,056 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 20%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add quantum state searcht=6, r=1 · running time44.86 s -> 4.74 s (9.45x)HelpedCircuit Design and Efficient Simulation of Quantum Inner Product and Empirical Studies of Its Effect on Near-Term Hybrid Quantum-Classic Machine Learning (CVPR 2024 · 9 citations)
Add weight decay to PEPITACIFAR-10 · accuracy52.45±0.25 -> 53.05±0.23HelpedForward Learning with Top-Down Feedback: Empirical and Analytical Characterization (ICLR 2024 · 7 citations)
Train with the BER objective only instead of combined objectivesHigh SNR · LER27 times higher LERHurtDeep Quantum Error Correction (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
Use H1 instead of H5 split heuristicModel_2_20 · safe rate78.5% -> 78.91%HelpedEnumerating Safe Regions in Deep Neural Networks with Provable Probabilistic Guarantees (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
Add Gaussian white noise to the targetFeynman LP subset · solution rateMixedGINN-LP: A Growing Interpretable Neural Network for Discovering Multivariate Laurent Polynomial Equations (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
increase network width from 5 to 10 neuronsΣ2 · JSR approximation precision9.0251 -> 8.6969HelpedStability Analysis of Switched Linear Systems with Neural Lyapunov Functions (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase CNN7 width from 1× to 2×CIFAR-10 ε=2/255 · certified accuracyHelpedUnderstanding Certified Training with Interval Bound Propagation (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Add Jacobian homeostatic lossCIFAR-10 validation · Top-1 accuracy (%)60.4 ± 0.4 -> 84.3 ± 0.1HelpedImproving equilibrium propagation without weight symmetry through Jacobian homeostasis (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
use a deformed metric with selected hyperparameters rather than the standard metricRadar and HDM05 · accuracyHelpedRMLR: Extending Multinomial Logistic Regression into General Geometries (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Increase the number of retained pathways/featuresSynthetic multivariable case · test-set MSEMixedExplainable Neural Networks with Guarantee: A Sparse Estimation Approach (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Apply the learned adaptive-temperature function only at inferenceCLRS-Text · accuracyHurtSoftmax is not Enough (for Sharp Size Generalisation) (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Add data augmentation to pcDEQ-1-MC-ReLU6CIFAR-10 test · accuracy78.2 -> 89.2HelpedPositive Concave Deep Equilibrium Models (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 18 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 4 of 18 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 18 papers
  • Tiny ImageNet · 2 of 18 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 75 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy