atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Towards a Self-contained Data-driven Global Weather Forecasting Framework

ICML 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Prediction and decision losses · approach: Determinantal point process inference

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Couples the FengWu AI forecasting model with an AI-embedded 4DVar data assimilation algorithm (model-error-aware objective, spherical-harmonic horizontal background covariance, autodiff solver) to run a self-contained global forecast system for a year using simulated ERA5 observations.

Problem

Data-driven weather forecasting models depend on analysis states produced by expensive traditional data assimilation such as 4DVar, which is computationally costly and inconsistent with AI models.

Approach

Replace the physics model in the 4DVar objective with the AI forecast model (1-hour variant), add a model-error covariance term Q to the observation covariance, model horizontal background error via spherical convolution using SHT, and solve for the analysis with autodiff and L-BFGS instead of hand-coded adjoints.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use AI-embedded 4DVar instead of 3DVarFengWu-4DVar · z500 analysis, 15% observation proportionRMSEHelped
Add the model error term to the objective function (ablation)AI-embedded 4DVar · z500 analysis, cyclic forecastingRMSE: above 200 m2/s2 after a weekHelped
Use spherical convolution instead of ordinary convolution to approximate horizontal correlation (ablation)AI-embedded 4DVar · z500 analysis incrementanalysis increment continuityHelped
Add horizontal correlation to the background covariance approximation (ablation)AI-embedded 4DVar · z500 analysis incrementanalysis increment continuityHelped
Reduce observation proportion from 15% to 5%FengWu-4DVar · z500 analysisRMSE: about 40 m2/s2Hurt
Increase observation noise standard deviation from 0.001 to 0.01FengWu-4DVar · z500 analysisRMSE: from around 20 m2/s2 to over 70 m2/s2Hurt
Use AI-embedded 4DVar rather than 3DVarFengWu-4DVar · z500 analysis with noisier observationsRMSEHelped
Use different initial statesFengWu-4DVar · z500 analysisRMSE: around 20 daysNo clear effect
Remove the model error term from the objective function (ablation)AI-embedded 4DVar · z500 analysis, cyclic forecastingRMSE: above 200 m2/s2 after a weekHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ERA5

Benchmarks: ERA5 simulated observations

Metrics: RMSE Bias

Baselines: 3DVar IFS 6-hour forecast traditional 4DVar ordinary convolution horizontal correlation diagonal background covariance

Builds on: 4DVar FengWu Geer (2021) AI-embedded 4DVar torch-harmonics

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy