AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Adaptive testing and experiments

Sequential decision and testing procedures for validity, treatment effects and instance selection.

201 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “selection · robust · test”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

52 papers in 2023–24 and 54 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 9.7% to 9.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 8162017: 15172018: 13182019: 13192020: 13202021: 10212022: 23222023: 23232024: 29242025: 24252026: 3026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

150 papers here report 1,189 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 62%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 22%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Omit the c²σ²x term from the variance model1D simulated experiment · Agreement with simulated varianceHurtResolution Limit of Single-Photon LiDAR (CVPR 2024 · 9 citations)
Use 4 attention heads instead of the hp* settingα=0.001 · amplification16.38 (7.37) -> 18.47 (9.03)No clear effectAlgorithmic Collective Action in Recommender Systems: Promoting Songs by Reordering Playlists (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase the positive scaling weight from 1 to 50South Dakota properties, five-fold validation · AUC0.772 -> 0.742HurtData-Driven Structural Fire Risk Prediction for City Properties (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Add smoothness vector to the scale-vector-only variantNYUv2 · Δm (%)2.46 -> 1.16HelpedGO4Align: Group Optimization for Multi-Task Alignment (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Replace a fixed ε in PAS with adaptive ε updatesSynthetic · Tracking error and excess cumulative returnHelpedAdaptive Passive-Aggressive Framework for Online Regression with Side Information (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Increase the degree of reviewer miscalibrationSynthetic Swiss NSF review data · expected utilityMixedA Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
set ω1=1/T instead of ω1=1/√TAR(1), T=500 · Power (%)22.2 -> 70.0Helpede-GAI: e-value-based Generalized $\alpha$-Investing for Online False Discovery Rate Control (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the total budget to T=40000Synthetic RCT, T=40000 · normalized certificatewithin 0.5%No clear effectData-driven Design of Randomized Control Trials with Guaranteed Treatment Effects (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
remove per-key tracking from TRobustEst (use RobustEst)Uniform query sets · queries answered effectivelytwo orders of magnitudeHelpedBreaking the Quadratic Barrier: Robust Cardinality Sketches for Adaptive Queries (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
use clustered robust rather than non-robust variance estimationOnline Retail, null · false detection rate0.168 ± 0.004 -> 0.044 ± 0.002HelpedYEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove top-k re-evaluation and re-evaluate the whole archiveQDax · QD-ScoreHurtQuality-Diversity with Limited Resources (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Use the naive nesting bound instead of the depth-16 extended Huber boundPermanent estimation · convergenceHelpedEstimating the Permanent by Nesting Importance Sampling (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 34 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 34 papers

Baselines

  • Energy · 3 of 34 papers
  • MSP · 2 of 34 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 106 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy