AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Shapley value attribution

Estimate Shapley values efficiently for feature attribution and data valuation.

63 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “explanations · shapley · attribution”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

18 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.4% to 4.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 0182019: 3192020: 4202021: 7212022: 3222023: 8232024: 10242025: 17252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

47 papers here report 387 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 14%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase explanation order k from 1 (Shapley value) to higher orderssynthetic and ML applications · Shapley-weighted R^2Helpedshapiq: Shapley Interactions for Machine Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 13 citations)
Add paired samplingSample-size experiments across settings · relative squared ℓ2 errorroughly four or moreHelpedProvably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score Sampling (ICLR 2025 · 3 citations)
Use Precompute instead of Base implementationImplementation experiments · runtimeHelpedSHAP values via sparse Fourier representation (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Replace the linear approximation with a tree-based approximationEight datasets, m=40n · relative squared ℓ2 error5.35e-04 -> 1.35e-04HelpedRegression-adjusted Monte Carlo Estimators for Shapley Values and Probabilistic Values (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
vary the RNA base encoding schemeRNA splicing efficiency reconstruction · R²0.80, 0.77, 0.78, 0.77No clear effectSHAP zero Explains Biological Sequence Models with Near-zero Marginal Cost for Future Queries (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Use a first-order Taylor approximationGPT2, Pile, 3500th training iteration · RMSE against Monte Carlo estimate0.0003HelpedData Shapley in One Training Run (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Use GEM-FIX-LR instead of the regularized GEM-FIX formulationCooperative-game simulation · Shapley-value estimation availabilityHurtUnlocking the Game: Estimating Games in Möbius Representation for Explanation and High-Order Interaction Detection (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the number of background samples from 50 to 100OpenML-CTR23 and OpenML-CC18; functional component importance · datasets with relative differences exceeding ±30%18 -> 9HelpedFast Estimation of Partial Dependence Functions using Trees (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Train the KAN with Shapley lossTabular prediction · AUCHelpedPrediction via Shapley Value Regression (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
sample without replacement instead of with replacementevaluated datasets · normalized MSENo clear effectA Unified Framework for Provably Efficient Algorithms to Estimate Shapley Values (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase patch set from 1×1 to 2×2CUB fine-grained · accuracy33.2% -> 45.8%HelpedInstaSHAP: Interpretable Additive Models Explain Shapley Values Instantly (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 22 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Adult · 3 of 22 papers
  • breast cancer · 2 of 22 papers
  • diabetes · 2 of 22 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 22 papers
  • Bike Sharing · 2 of 22 papers
  • Independent · 2 of 22 papers
  • NHANES · 2 of 22 papers
  • Communities · 2 of 22 papers

Baselines

  • Kernel SHAP · 10 of 22 papers
  • FastSHAP · 4 of 22 papers
  • LeverageSHAP · 3 of 22 papers
  • LIME · 2 of 22 papers
  • Bivariate SHAP · 2 of 22 papers
  • SHAP · 2 of 22 papers
  • Sampling SHAP · 2 of 22 papers
  • pltreeshap · 2 of 22 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 45 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy