AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Losses for decision-making

Design losses for learning to defer, predict-then-optimize and risk criteria beyond average error.

68 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “losses · loss functions · surrogate”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

22 papers in 2023–24 and 13 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 4.1% to 2.3%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 3182019: 5192020: 3202021: 13212022: 8222023: 10232024: 12242025: 9252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

56 papers here report 518 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 19%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use one output per input instead of both preference outputsGSM8K (8-shot, chain-of-thought) · EM53.5 -> 50.0HurtModel Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization (ICML 2024 · 23 citations)
Add feature-based parameterization (FBP) to LODLCubic Top-K · Normalized Test Decision Quality-0.38 ± 0.29 -> 0.58 ± 0.26HelpedLeaving the Nest: Going beyond Local Loss Functions for Predict-Then-Optimize (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
fix the reparameterization matrices to the identityQuadratic OU (easy) · control L2 errorHurtStochastic Optimal Control Matching (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use adaptive loss truncation and incrementally increasing mini-batchesADBench datasets · AUCHelpedALTBI: Constructing Improved Outlier Detection Models via Optimization of Inlier-Memorization Effect (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Assign shared margin parameters to minority classes and distinct parameters to frequent classesCIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet step-imbalanced settings · accuracyNo clear effectBalancing the Scales: A Theoretical and Algorithmic Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Data (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use exit layer 12 instead of layer 1 for loss-based SIFTBERT validation set, last step · validation accuracy0.6599 -> 0.6640HelpedUnderstanding the Training Speedup from Sampling with Approximate Losses (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Vary the smoothing parameterInference tasks across model architectures · performanceNo clear effectCoded Computing for Resilient Distributed Computing: A Learning-Theoretic Framework (NeurIPS 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 11 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 4 of 11 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 11 papers
  • SVHN · 2 of 11 papers
  • Tiny ImageNet · 2 of 11 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 35 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy