atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

The Prevalence of Neural Collapse in Neural Multivariate Regression

NeurIPS 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Symmetry and equivariance in loss landscapes · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that neural multivariate regression exhibits three neural-collapse-like properties (NRC1-3) and explains them via the unconstrained feature model with L2 regularization, showing no collapse without regularization.

Problem

Neural collapse has been characterized only for classification; it is unknown whether regression models trained with MSE exhibit analogous geometric collapse of last-layer features and weights.

Approach

Defines Neural Regression Collapse (feature collapse to the top-n PCA subspace, feature-weight self-duality, and a covariance-determined Gram structure of W) and explains it with the unconstrained feature model for L2 regression, where collapse requires strictly positive regularization.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
train with positive weight decayneural regression models · Swimmer, Reacher, Hopper, CARLA 1D, CARLA 2D, UTKFaceNRC1Helped
train with positive weight decayneural regression models · Swimmer, Reacher, Hopper, CARLA 1D, CARLA 2D, UTKFaceNRC2Helped
train with positive weight decayneural regression models · Swimmer, Reacher, Hopper, CARLA 1D, CARLA 2D, UTKFaceNRC3Helped
remove weight decay (ablation)neural regression models · Six regression datasetsNRC1-NRC3Hurt
remove weight decay (ablation)MLP on small MuJoCo datasets · MuJoCotest MSEHurt
increase weight decay slightly above zero (ablation)neural regression models · Six regression datasetsNRC1-NRC3Helped
use L2 penalties on features and final-layer weights instead of weight decay, and remove penultimate-layer ReLU (ablation)UFM-assumption model · Six regression datasetsNRC1-NRC3Hurt
increase feature regularization while holding final-layer regularization fixed (ablation)UFM-assumption model · Additional experimentsfeature normHurt
increase feature regularization while holding final-layer regularization fixed (ablation)UFM-assumption model · Additional experimentsfinal-layer weight normHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MuJoCo Swimmer expert data MuJoCo Reacher expert data D4RL Hopper CARLA driving dataset UTKFace

Benchmarks: Swimmer Reacher Hopper CARLA UTKFace

Metrics: NRC1 NRC2 NRC3 train/test MSE R^2 explained variance ratio

Builds on: neural collapse unconstrained feature model layered-peeled model

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy