AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

Depth-based hand pose regression

Estimates 3D hand pose from depth or RGB images using CNN regression, dense prediction and neural rendering.

84 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Human pose estimation, keyword cluster “object pose · 6d · hand”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 2 of 5 tracked benchmarks.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 19 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.7% to 6.3%.

Open questions the data points to

What looks settled

No longer reported by papers here: FreiHAND (F@5 mm, last in 2024); FreiHAND (F@15 mm, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 3172018: 7182019: 8192020: 9202021: 4212022: 10222023: 11232024: 10242025: 13252026: 626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

FreiHAND · F@5 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2022–2025 · still improving

2022: 0.7842024: 0.7852025: 0.825
20222025
YearBest so farSet by
20220.784MobRecon: Mobile-Friendly Hand Mesh Reconstruction From Monocular Image (CVPR 2022 · 109 citations)
20240.785Reconstructing Hands in 3D with Transformers (CVPR 2024 · 151 citations)
20250.825WiLoR: End-to-end 3D Hand Localization and Reconstruction in-the-wild (CVPR 2025 · 49 citations)

FreiHAND · F@15 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2022–2025 · small gains only

2022: 0.9862024: 0.992025: 0.993
20222025
YearBest so farSet by
20220.986MobRecon: Mobile-Friendly Hand Mesh Reconstruction From Monocular Image (CVPR 2022 · 109 citations)
20240.99Reconstructing Hands in 3D with Transformers (CVPR 2024 · 151 citations)
20250.993WiLoR: End-to-end 3D Hand Localization and Reconstruction in-the-wild (CVPR 2025 · 49 citations)

FreiHAND · PA-MPVPE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2024–2025 · still improving

2024: 5.52025: 5.1
20242025

FreiHAND · F@5 mm (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 0.6142023: 0.6542024: 0.783
20202024

FreiHAND · F@15 mm (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 0.9662023: 0.9712024: 0.991
20202024

What has been tried

77 papers here report 858 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 79%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 15%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase training examples by 4×HInt New Days, all joints · PCK@0.0516.9 -> 31.3HelpedReconstructing Hands in 3D with Transformers (CVPR 2024 · 151 citations)
add the large-scale WHIM training data rather than train on Oxford-HandsOxford-Hands and WHIM · mAP40.34 -> 48.98; 35.29 -> 53.79HelpedWiLoR: End-to-end 3D Hand Localization and Reconstruction in-the-wild (CVPR 2025 · 49 citations)
Use two-view input instead of single view for hand trackingHOT3D and UmeTrack hand tracking · MKPE (mm)HOT3D 15.4 -> 10.9; UmeTrack 13.4 -> 9.5 (about 41% improvement in two-view mode)HelpedHOT3D: Hand and Object Tracking in 3D from Egocentric Multi-View Videos (CVPR 2025 · 35 citations)
use global 3D SDFs as the intermediate representation instead of 2D keypointsDexYCB test · MJE14.9 -> 10.1HelpedHOISDF: Constraining 3D Hand-Object Pose Estimation with Global Signed Distance Fields (CVPR 2024 · 20 citations)
add Token Sampler Branch to fusionFreiHAND · F@5mm0.722 -> 0.738HelpedHamba: Single-view 3D Hand Reconstruction with Graph-guided Bi-Scanning Mamba (NeurIPS 2024 · 18 citations)
Add ABM and RGR pseudo-labeling modulesDah → Dah, Dah-Headset1 · Mono-M (MPJPE, mm)24.96 -> 20.16HelpedSingle-to-Dual-View Adaptation for Egocentric 3D Hand Pose Estimation (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
increase the fusion stages from 1 to 3DexYCB S0 · MPJPE (mm)7.23 -> 6.89HelpedKeypoint Fusion for RGB-D Based 3D Hand Pose Estimation (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
Add pretrained ViTHOT3D · PA-MPJPE7.59 -> 4.79HelpedHaWoR: World-Space Hand Motion Reconstruction from Egocentric Videos (CVPR 2025 · 8 citations)
Use temporal smoothing or TOCH instead of BioPRDexYCB · MPJPEless than a 0.8mm improvementHurtMS-MANO: Enabling Hand Pose Tracking with Biomechanical Constraints (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
use instance-specific queries instead of unified queriesHInt New Days · PCK@0.180.7 -> 82.5HelpedHandOS: 3D Hand Reconstruction in One Stage (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
replace 3D hand-pose representation with hand anglesEvaluation · R²88.86 ± 11.92% -> 84.22 ± 17.11%HurtPosture-Informed Muscular Force Learning for Robust Hand Pressure Estimation (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
remove coarse UV-pressure loss LcEgoPressure ego. & exo. · UV Press. Contact IoU33.12 -> 26.24HurtEgoPressure: A Dataset for Hand Pressure and Pose Estimation in Egocentric Vision (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
Hampali et al.HO-3DF@550.6 – 57.42 papers, e.g. CVPR 2021 and CVPR 2025

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 15 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • DexYCB · 8 of 15 papers
  • FreiHAND · 5 of 15 papers
  • HO3D · 3 of 15 papers
  • ObMan · 2 of 15 papers
  • HO3D-v2 · 2 of 15 papers
  • MOW · 2 of 15 papers
  • RHD · 2 of 15 papers
  • HOT3D · 2 of 15 papers

Baselines

  • MeshGraphormer · 4 of 15 papers
  • HaMeR · 4 of 15 papers
  • METRO · 3 of 15 papers
  • SimpleHand · 3 of 15 papers
  • HandOccNet · 3 of 15 papers
  • MobRecon · 3 of 15 papers
  • S2HAND · 2 of 15 papers
  • AMVUR · 2 of 15 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 40 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy