AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

Multi-person pose estimation

Detects and assigns keypoints for many people using top-down, bottom-up or single-stage approaches.

51 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Human pose estimation, keyword cluster “human pose · pose estimation · 3d human”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

12 papers in 2023–24 and 7 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 4.4% to 2.3%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: CrowdPose test (AP, last in 2024); COCO test-dev (AP, last in 2024); COCO val2017 (AP, last in 2024); MuPoTS-3D (PCK_abs, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 3172018: 2182019: 4192020: 6202021: 9212022: 7222023: 6232024: 6242025: 3252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CrowdPose test · AP (higher is better)

6 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 74.3
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
202174.3RSGNet: Relation based Skeleton Graph Network for Crowded Scenes Pose Estimation (AAAI 2021 · 15 citations)

COCO test-dev · AP (higher is better)

5 papers, 2017–2024 · not reported since 2024

2017: 61.82021: 76
20172024

COCO val2017 · AP (higher is better)

5 papers, 2022–2024 · not reported since 2024

2022: 76.4
20222024
YearBest so farSet by
202276.4Adaptive Hypergraph Neural Network for Multi-Person Pose Estimation (AAAI 2022 · 12 citations)

MuPoTS-3D · PCK_abs (higher is better)

4 papers, 2021–2022 · not reported since 2022

2021: 48
20212022

What has been tried

46 papers here report 501 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 78%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 16%, mixed 1%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use coordinate classification with DCC and MLE instead of regressionCOCO val2017 · AP65.6 -> 67.6HelpedRTMO: Towards High-Performance One-Stage Real-Time Multi-Person Pose Estimation (CVPR 2024 · 97 citations)
Add a Refine decoderAll test samples · MPJPE116.1 -> 107.2HelpedPerson-in-WiFi 3D: End-to-End Multi-Person 3D Pose Estimation with Wi-Fi (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
use ground-truth 2d poses instead of pseudo 2d posesPanoptic · MPJPE24.5 -> 19.9HelpedSelfPose3d: Self-Supervised Multi-Person Multi-View 3d Pose Estimation (CVPR 2024 · 22 citations)
set signal scale to 5.0 instead of 1.0CrowdPose test · AP72.4 -> 72.7HelpedDiffusionRegPose: Enhancing Multi-Person Pose Estimation using a Diffusion-Based End-to-End Regression Approach (CVPR 2024 · 9 citations)
Use router-controlled routing instead of random routingCOCO · APHelpedDynPose: Largely Improving the Efficiency of Human Pose Estimation by a Simple Dynamic Framework (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Add recurrent GRU update to the hidden statePoseTrack · 2D@0.0573.0 -> 74.9HelpedCoMotion: Concurrent Multi-person 3D Motion (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
pretrain on pose datasets and train on PVCP instead of PVCP training alonePVCP testset (All), 2D Det input · MPVE (mm)315.64 -> 282.50HelpedPedestrian-Centric 3D Pre-collision Pose and Shape Estimation from Dashcam Perspective (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
DEKROCHuman TestAP38.2 – 52.22 papers, e.g. CVPR 2022 and NeurIPS 2021
BaselineCOCO val2017AP60 – 74.32 papers, e.g. CVPR 2022 and AAAI 2022
Kocabas et al.3DPW occlusion subsetPA-MPJPE72.2 – 82.52 papers, e.g. CVPR 2021 and AAAI 2021

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 9 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MPII · 3 of 9 papers
  • JHMDB · 2 of 9 papers
  • COCO · 2 of 9 papers
  • AMASS · 2 of 9 papers

Baselines

  • ED-Pose · 3 of 9 papers
  • PETR · 3 of 9 papers
  • DEKR · 3 of 9 papers
  • SimpleBaseline · 2 of 9 papers
  • RTMPose · 2 of 9 papers
  • CID · 2 of 9 papers
  • MotionBERT · 2 of 9 papers
  • PyMAF · 2 of 9 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 19 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 32 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy