atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Symmetric Matrix Completion with ReLU Sampling

ICML 2024 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: Low-rank and single-index recovery · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Studies symmetric PSD low-rank matrix completion when only positive (ReLU) or above-threshold entries are observed, proving local geodesic strong convexity near the planted matrix and proposing a tailored spectral initialization for gradient descent.

Problem

Low-rank symmetric PSD matrix completion where the observation pattern depends deterministically on entry values (only non-negative entries observed under ReLU sampling), where global landscape is not benign and standard random initialization fails.

Approach

Shows that under ReLU or threshold sampling, the factorized objective is geodesically strongly convex on the quotient manifold in a neighborhood of the planted matrix, with an entry-dependent spectral initialization (observed entries kept, missing entries set to negative magnitudes) that lets gradient descent reach the global optimum.</ntml:parameter>

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the tailor-designed initialization instead of RI initialization (ablation)GD for ReLU matrix completion · ReLU MC, σ = 0completion error γ_T: 0.5 ± 0.13 -> (7.6 ± 0.7) · 10^{-11}Helped
Use the tailor-designed initialization instead of RS initialization (ablation)GD for ReLU matrix completion · ReLU MC, σ = 0completion error γ_T: 0.45 ± 0.24 -> (7.6 ± 0.7) · 10^{-11}Helped
Use the tailor-designed initialization instead of RI initialization (ablation)GD for ReLU matrix completion · ReLU MC, σ = 10^{-4}completion error γ_T: 0.51 ± 0.13 -> (4.4 ± 0.13)·10^{-5}Helped
Use the tailor-designed initialization instead of RS initialization (ablation)GD for ReLU matrix completion · ReLU MC, σ = 10^{-4}completion error γ_T: 0.51 ± 0.13 -> (4.4 ± 0.13)·10^{-5}Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: synthetic symmetric PSD matrices synthetic Euclidean distance matrices

Metrics: gradient norm function value relative completion error CPU time

Baselines: ADMM ScaledGD PAM MPAM GNMR random imputation spectral initialization random spectral initialization

Builds on: low-rank matrix completion via factorization quotient manifold optimization

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy