AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Loss landscape analysis

Characterize local minima and critical points in neural network loss surfaces.

61 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “losses · loss functions · surrogate”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

11 papers in 2023–24 and 11 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 2.1% to 1.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 2172018: 7182019: 8192020: 7202021: 6212022: 8222023: 4232024: 7242025: 6252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

52 papers here report 469 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 61%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 23%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add the heat loss to boundary and eikonal losses2D dataset · IoU0.8192 -> 0.9851HelpedHotSpot: Signed Distance Function Optimization with an Asymptotically Sufficient Condition (CVPR 2025 · 10 citations)
Remove whitening, retaining Zipfian centering onlySTS-B · Spearman correlation ×10066.92 -> 52.25HurtZipfian Whitening (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Use wavelet order 3Spleen test set · Dice score0.921 (6.91 · 10−2) -> 0.911 (7.38 · 10−2)HurtTask-Driven Wavelets using Constrained Empirical Risk Minimization (CVPR 2024 · 1 citation)
Increase embedding dimensionsCUB · MAP@RHelpedMean Field Theory in Deep Metric Learning (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Add sparse training examples using f_inv_sqrt instead of default samplingModular addition N=16, q=257 · τ=0.5% accuracy1.2% -> 99.8%HelpedMaking Hard Problems Easier with Custom Data Distributions and Loss Regularization: A Case Study in Modular Arithmetic (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add importance-weighting drift (ξ=1) rather than removing itWaterbirds · worst-group accuracy81.7_{±{2.6}} -> 84.1_{±{1.1}}HelpedElliptic Loss Regularization (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace no normalization with batch normalization or layer normalizationMNIST rotations and CIFAR10 noise · reversion-to-OCS trendNo clear effectDeep Neural Networks Tend To Extrapolate Predictably (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Remove the eikonal lossUnit sphere · flatness errorHurtPolyhedral Complex Derivation from Piecewise Trilinear Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
allow dual couplings ˜β and ˜κ to vary2D Ising model with target κ = 0 · recovery of expected Kramers-Wannier dualsHelpedA Machine Learning Approach to Duality in Statistical Physics (ICML 2025)
Vary distortion parameter c across 0.95, 0.65, and 0.35CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 · accuracyMixedMonotone, Bi-Lipschitz, and Polyak-Łojasiewicz Networks (ICML 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 3 of 8 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 22 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy