AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Reasoning mechanisms and failure modes

Analyze symbolic mechanisms, attention glitches, and hallucination in LLM reasoning.

114 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Language, safety and interpretability, keyword cluster “languages · pretraining · multilingual”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

25 papers in 2023–24 and 76 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.6% to 4.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 1182019: 3192020: 2202021: 2212022: 4222023: 9232024: 16242025: 31252026: 4526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

63 papers here report 601 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 55%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 27%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add random effects for each participant and embedding dimensionhorizon task, participant-level · negative log-likelihood25968.6 -> 23929.5HelpedTurning large language models into cognitive models (ICLR 2024 · 21 citations)
Zero out late attention heads14-task average, permuted labels · calibrated accuracy37.42 (1.47) -> 47.58 (1.47)HelpedOverthinking the Truth: Understanding how Language Models Process False Demonstrations (ICLR 2024 · 6 citations)
suppress SAS until 3000 steps, then release the regularizer100K training steps · MLM loss1.77 ± 0.01 -> 1.75 ± 0.01HelpedSudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMs (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Use the confirmatory 2α model instead of the four-rate full-feedback model2AFC full feedback · posterior probability0.92 ± 0.03HelpedIn-Context Learning Agents Are Asymmetric Belief Updaters (ICML 2024 · 4 citations)
Add GMamba and LMamba to the baseline inference modulePong · score8 -> 18HelpedGLAM: Global-Local Variation Awareness in Mamba-based World Model (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Train with Train-II queries only, without atomic triplesTest-II · accuracyHelpedHow do Transformers Learn Implicit Reasoning? (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Increase context length from a single token to t=16Concept detection · accuracyMixedA Language Model’s Guide Through Latent Space (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Ablate the top 10% of CMR-like heads instead of the same number of randomly selected headsC4 sampled texts · ICL scoreHurtLinking In-context Learning in Transformers to Human Episodic Memory (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Add symbol abstraction headsIdentity rules, ABA and ABB · probability assigned to correct answerHelpedEmergent Symbolic Mechanisms Support Abstract Reasoning in Large Language Models (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Add queried-rule locating heads to the circuitNormal samples · Δ^C_normal/Δ_normal-0.97 -> 0.94HelpedA Implies B: Circuit Analysis in LLMs for Propositional Logical Reasoning (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Increase the number of descriptive propertiesDescriptive type checks · performanceHurtA Percolation Model of Emergence: Analyzing Transformers Trained on a Formal Language (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Mask question and option contents in demonstrations while retaining formatting words and final answersMMLU · probability of choosing a label in ABCDNo clear effectUnderstanding In-Context Learning from Repetitions (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 41 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MMLU · 3 of 41 papers
  • ARC Challenge · 3 of 41 papers
  • TinyStories · 2 of 41 papers
  • GSM8K · 2 of 41 papers
  • MATH · 2 of 41 papers
  • CommonsenseQA · 2 of 41 papers
  • MedMCQA · 2 of 41 papers
  • ARC Easy · 2 of 41 papers

Baselines

  • Random · 3 of 41 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 101 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 33 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy