AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Faithfulness of LLM explanations

Evaluate whether natural-language explanations are faithful using counterfactuals and simulatability.

169 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Language, safety and interpretability, keyword cluster “prompt · uncertainty · shot”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

48 papers in 2023–24 and 55 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 6.9% to 3.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 3172018: 12182019: 11192020: 13202021: 18212022: 8222023: 23232024: 25242025: 20252026: 3526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

129 papers here report 1,401 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 22%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add behavior meta-path promptsRecrX point-wise Random · AUC0.71 to 0.88HelpedExploring Large Language Model for Graph Data Understanding in Online Job Recommendations (AAAI 2024 · 68 citations)
Distill using clinical rationales rather than training without rationale augmentationADNI · accuracyHelpedLarge Language Models Are Clinical Reasoners: Reasoning-Aware Diagnosis Framework with Prompt-Generated Rationales (AAAI 2024 · 44 citations)
add keypoint descriptionsCOCO Keypoint val · AP70.8 -> 72.4HelpedLocLLM: Exploiting Generalizable Human Keypoint Localization via Large Language Model (CVPR 2024 · 19 citations)
combine spatial and temporal tokens rather than use either token type aloneEmilya, KDAE, and EGBM · accuracyEmilya: 85.08 and 83.62 -> 86.36; KDAE: 62.99 and 61.21 -> 63.35; EGBM: 53.21 and 49.54 -> 55.96HelpedUnderstanding Emotional Body Expressions via Large Language Models (AAAI 2025 · 16 citations)
Add rating smoothingYelp · FMR8.66 -> 8.71HelpedCoherency Improved Explainable Recommendation via Large Language Model (AAAI 2025 · 11 citations)
Replace SentenceTransformer with RoBERTa as the backboneCEBaB, original candidate set · L2 error.65 -> .66No clear effectFaithful Explanations of Black-box NLP Models Using LLM-generated Counterfactuals (ICLR 2024 · 7 citations)
add LguideBeerAdvocate Appearance · F181.4 -> 84.0HelpedLearning Robust Rationales for Model Explainability: A Guidance-Based Approach (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
Add the Situation node to the reasoning processSSConv-test · NAvg1.372 -> 1.390HelpedSocialSim: Towards Socialized Simulation of Emotional Support Conversation (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
increase HSphNN feedback from a maximum of two rounds to a maximum of ten roundsSyllogistic reasoning · correct decision and explanation84.76% to 85.16%No clear effectNeural Reasoning for Sure Through Constructing Explainable Models (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
remove LLM alignment loss (L^L)Games · HR@50.0836 -> 0.0858HurtSemantic Convergence: Harmonizing Recommender Systems via Two-Stage Alignment and Behavioral Semantic Tokenization (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
add task-specific agent instructions instead of using zero-shot CoTAddSub · QEM73.2 -> 79.5HelpedAgent Instructs Large Language Models to be General Zero-Shot Reasoners (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase autoregressive generation masks from one to threeGerman-to-English translation (1-shot) · SacreBLEU10.0 -> 23.7HelpedBERTs are Generative In-Context Learners (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 27 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • GSM8K · 3 of 27 papers

Baselines

  • GPT-4 · 4 of 27 papers
  • gpt-3.5-turbo · 3 of 27 papers
  • GPT-3.5 · 2 of 27 papers
  • Llama-2-13B-chat · 2 of 27 papers
  • gpt-4o · 2 of 27 papers
  • Llama-3-8B-Instruct · 2 of 27 papers
  • GPT-4o mini · 2 of 27 papers
  • Claude · 2 of 27 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 103 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy