AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Uncertainty quantification for LLMs

Quantify confidence and uncertainty to benchmark and evaluate language models.

136 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Language, safety and interpretability, keyword cluster “safety · jailbreak · harmful”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Leveling off Several papers from 2025–26 still report on 1 tracked benchmark, but the best result has barely moved since 2024.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 109 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.7% to 5.9%.

What looks settled

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 0202021: 0212022: 0222023: 1232024: 25242025: 38252026: 7126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

TriviaQA · AUROC (higher is better)

5 papers, 2024–2025 · flat since 2024

2024: 0.866
20242025

What has been tried

64 papers here report 706 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 21%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add practical difficulty calibration (PDC)Wiki, GPT-J and LLaMA · AUC0.648 -> 0.929; 0.653 -> 0.951HelpedMembership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibration (NeurIPS 2024 · 28 citations)
Add prompt covariates to PE-RaschMMLU, BBH, and LMentry · Wasserstein-1 distanceHelpedEfficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMs (NeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations)
Use logprob differences instead of binary yes/no featuresOut-of-distribution lie detection · AUCHelpedHow to Catch an AI Liar: Lie Detection in Black-Box LLMs by Asking Unrelated Questions (ICLR 2024 · 7 citations)
Reduce the number of reference responses from 10 toward 1CoQA, TriviaQA, SciQ, and NQ · AUROCHurtSemantic Density: Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models through Confidence Measurement in Semantic Space (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Add confidence sampling rather than returning a single randomly sampled responseStrategyQA · accuracy49.20 -> 53.10HelpedWho Knows the Answer? Finding the Best Model and Prompt for Each Query Using Confidence-Based Search (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
use heuristic rather than random masking during corruptor trainingFECDATA test, retrieved evidence · SARI Final60.04 -> 65.59; 58.54 -> 61.30HelpedImproving Factual Error Correction by Learning to Inject Factual Errors (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
Replace frequency with semantic diversity as the reliability measureVMME · APSS2.81 -> 2.74; 2.58 -> 2.52; 2.70 -> 2.42; 2.24 -> 2.20HelpedSample then Identify: A General Framework for Risk Control and Assessment in Multimodal Large Language Models (ICLR 2025 · 3 citations)
Add test-time feature clippingCoQA · AUROC (sentence similarity)79.3 -> 80.4HelpedINSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detection (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Use KLE(K_heat) instead of KLE(K_full)Llama 2 70B Chat, Trivia QA · AUROC0.80 ± 0.03 -> 0.84 ± 0.03HelpedKernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similarities (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Add maximum probability statisticWikiBio sentence-level NonFact · AUC86.48 -> 90.93HelpedEnhancing Uncertainty Modeling with Semantic Graph for Hallucination Detection (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Vary the number of sampled layersuncertainty estimation across evaluated models · ECEMixedFLUE: Streamlined Uncertainty Estimation for Large Language Models (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Use reversal-augmented backdoor data rather than backdoored data without augmentationBackdoor trigger elicitation · Trigger elicitation rateapproximately 30%HelpedTell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviors (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 54 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MMLU · 10 of 54 papers
  • TriviaQA · 6 of 54 papers
  • TruthfulQA · 6 of 54 papers
  • GSM8K · 5 of 54 papers
  • CommonsenseQA · 4 of 54 papers
  • MATH · 4 of 54 papers
  • OpenbookQA · 3 of 54 papers
  • LiveBench · 2 of 54 papers

Baselines

  • P(True) · 4 of 54 papers
  • Semantic Entropy · 3 of 54 papers
  • PandaLM-7B · 2 of 54 papers
  • JudgeLM-7B · 2 of 54 papers
  • GPT-4o · 2 of 54 papers
  • LAC · 2 of 54 papers
  • Perplexity · 2 of 54 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 135 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy