AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Language, safety and interpretability

Data and evaluation methodology

Assess datasets, evaluation failures, and summarization with description-length and data-curation tools.

136 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Language, safety and interpretability, keyword cluster “prompt · uncertainty · shot”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

39 papers in 2023–24 and 65 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 5.6% to 3.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 2172018: 4182019: 1192020: 4202021: 11212022: 9222023: 14232024: 25242025: 37252026: 2826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

100 papers here report 1,012 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 20%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add I3 to MiniGPT-4 (FT)IU X-RAY test · BLEU-10.389 -> 0.458HelpedBootstrapping Large Language Models for Radiology Report Generation (AAAI 2024 · 72 citations)
increase the LLaMA pre-training from none to 7B/13BHumanML3D validation · FID26.01 -> 0.590 -> 0.542HelpedMotionGPT: Finetuned LLMs Are General-Purpose Motion Generators (AAAI 2024 · 69 citations)
Pretrain on MT-MTR without task descriptionsMoleculeNet classification · average score83.86 -> 83.11HurtMolTailor: Tailoring Chemical Molecular Representation to Specific Tasks via Text Prompts (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
Add chain-of-humor while using the contextTalkFunny · Hum.44.8 -> 50.1HelpedTalk Funny! A Large-Scale Humor Response Dataset with Chain-of-Humor Interpretation (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Add enhanced natural-language event descriptions to ID embeddingsCity A and City B · H@10.2774 -> 0.3176; 0.3056 -> 0.3427HelpedPredicting User Behavior in Smart Spaces with LLM-Enhanced Logs and Personalized Prompts (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)
add DICTrank cardiotoxicity keywords to the summary promptDICTrank · accuracy84.6 -> 88.1; 92.5 -> 90.4; 93.0 -> 93.7MixedUniTox: Leveraging LLMs to Curate a Unified Dataset of Drug-Induced Toxicity from FDA Labels (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
add self-supervised column-target trainingCC18 and CTR23 · test performanceHelpedTabDPT: Scaling Tabular Foundation Models on Real Data (NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations)
Add ANP emotion featuresCyber-MaD — Manifestation · FM33.73 -> 35.62HelpedBenchmarking Cyber Harassment Dialogue Comprehension through Emotion-Informed Manifestations-Determinants Demarcation (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
add syntactic similarity retrievalRest15 · F152.58 -> 53.30HelpedSimRP: Syntactic and Semantic Similarity Retrieval Prompting Enhances Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Use a long rather than short prompt in zero-shot classificationTREAT-ISE test · weighted F10.433 -> 0.581HelpedCharacterizing Information Seeking Events in Health-Related Social Discourse (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Retrieve top 10 rather than top 1 documentCFEVER test · recall69.05 -> 87.65HelpedCFEVER: A Chinese Fact Extraction and VERification Dataset (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
Use Rationale Extraction instead of Cross-Attn as the Stage I extractorCombined test set · R@50.1468 -> 0.3060HelpedDeciphering Compatibility Relationships with Textual Descriptions via Extraction and Explanation (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 44 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 2 of 44 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 44 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 44 papers
  • DeepCAD · 2 of 44 papers
  • OpenML CC-18 · 2 of 44 papers

Baselines

  • GPT-4o · 5 of 44 papers
  • LightGBM · 3 of 44 papers
  • XGBoost · 3 of 44 papers
  • CatBoost · 3 of 44 papers
  • Random · 3 of 44 papers
  • LLaMA3-8B · 2 of 44 papers
  • GPT-4V · 2 of 44 papers
  • TabPFN · 2 of 44 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 104 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy